How does IIFYM differ from traditional dieting?
 

Does IIFYM differ from traditional dieting?

I think it can, if the person is able to accurately count their macros (protein, carbohydrates, and fats) and plan their meals well. I had been doing pretty well with my Weight Watchers program (losing about a pound a week) but it was getting repetitive and the monthly fees were becoming costly.

When I started counting macros, I could see what foods were calorie dense and which were nutrient dense. This helped me make better choices for the long term.

I found that weighing myself daily kept me accountable. If I gained a pound over the weekend, it was usually an easy adjustment. I just needed to focus more on my vegetables and protein intake until the next weigh in.

I think this approach can be healthier and more sustainable than traditional dieting where you are constantly counting points or calories. You can have a treat every now and then without going off track, because you know what your body needs to feel good and perform well. Though I do think it's important not to become too obsessed with tracking every macro perfectly, as that can sometimes lead to its own issues.

Traditional dieting = food rules/restrictions.

IIFYM = numbers and flexibility.

Clean eating meal example: Chicken, brown rice and broccoli. Contains all necessary proteins, nutrients etc. A total of 700 calories.