What is it for you? That's another difference between people (as I'm taking note of how variable food and movement is for all of us)
Exercise for me, aerobic exercise especially, is an appetite suppressant. While I watched what I ate for the two years of very active exercise, I noted that on the days I missed the gym, I ate more.
And it's not that I was more tired, or gave myself leeway. No.... I always tried to eat for hunger, never sticking to a strict caloric intake. That means, I was constantly questioning my eating... Was I really hungry or just felt like eating? My daily intake varied from 1200- 1700 typically. And without a doubt, days I didn't exercise I was just hungrier and ate more.
I got reminded of that today when I accidentally made my 4 mile walk a 6 mile walk. I hadn't eaten beforee the walk. My plan was to eat when I got home. Well, I got home much later than planned and it was almost lunch time by then. And I wasn't hungry, just thirsty. So, I didn't eat lunch until 2 pm. Normally I eat a very small breakfast at 7, lunch around 11:30 and dinner at 6:30. Today, nope, and since I only ate a normal lunch the first half of the day, I let myself have a much bigger dinner since I was at a super huge calorie deficit for the day (ended the days around 1250) and it was so goooood (grilled flank steak and a nice salad). Going into dinner I was at 500 calories for the entire day and I got up to 1250 calories..
My husband is the opposite from me (as he is with most things when it comes to food). He gets ravenous with more exercise. His appetite goes up to the amount of calories he burned. So, if he burned 300 calories, he will need to eat 300 calories.
So, what that means is that I feel extra motivated to exercise because I don't get as hungry and I'm burning all those extra calories. I know many people feel the opposite. They get ravenous. Isn't that interesting how differently we respond? I'm fascinated by it!



