![]() |
You're on Page 2 of 2
|
Originally Posted by Robin41: See, it's all fine and good to say "you should fit within the healthy BMI standards" if you have a small frame. My husband has a smallish frame. He was fine at 189 according to BMI charts, but he knew he had a bit more fat and a bit too little muscle for his frame size for that weight. He has wiggle room. He now weighs 170, has more muscle and he looks fine - not even skinny! That's almost 20 pounds less! Me, on the other hand, have a large frame and so that means I have less wiggle room with those charts. I can get to within the guidelines probably as I'm not THAT hugely built, but it would be difficult, very difficult and I would have no wiggle room. I would insist, if I weighed 160 say, and the cut off is 158 I think for my height, that they do some other measure as it would be clear from looking at me that I wasn't fat, but if they wanted to check - do another test. And that also means many athletes are too heavy. Or anyone who body builds. Really? They are not healthy? Those charts are rough guidelines and do not include outlyers and like all bell curves, there are outlyers... including those that could weigh LESS than the BMI range and still be perfectly healthy. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM. |
You're on Page 2 of 2
|
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.