I always thought this was a no brainer, but since I read quite a number of comments about eating back exercise calories, I'm going to ask a question. I'm 5'7" tall and weigh 160 on a good day. That puts my BMR at 1113 calories. At the"moderately active" level, described as "moderate exercise 3 - 5 times per week," I multiply by 1.55 and get 1726. That's a pretty decent maintenance amount. But if I eat my exercise calories, too, I've gone over, correct? They are already factored into the equation.
My point is this: are many of us messing up by eating back calories that have already been accounted for? Even at the very active level, my total calories needed goes to just 1921.
While losing, I never even considered calories burned through exercise. Unless one is training or working out at a very high level, isn't it self defeating to do this? Maybe the comments I've read were in regard to a workout that was extreme on a given day for that person and on that one day they ate more. What have most of you done?
Lin