You do sound like one of those who can be very successful with calorie-counting......as compared to someone like, say......ME, who must use very strict low-carbing in order to lose weight.
But I wanted to add that it is the FAT in the low-carb diets (like Atkins, which *I* used)...that causes the fullness that lasts longer....much more than the protein.
And then to boot....if you are doing a diet like Atkins....with the very low carb/no simple carb (and that includes whole-grain bread and pasta and potatoes, not just sugary items)....you go into ketosis and the ketones seriously decrease your appetite.
But plain protein without the fat would probably not keep you full any longer than eating more carbs within a calorie range would.
You clearly have a very different metabolism than I have. And I'm not enough of an expert on the topic to know how things would work for you as opposed to me. But for me to lose weight.....it has to be severely restricted carbs (mainly coming from green veggies) but relatively high FAT. But if I were to eat the same amount of fat but add some potatoes or whole grain breads....I would start gaining weight. For me, the calories in the fat are inconsequential as long as I severely restrict the carbs. BUT if I add more carbs back in, suddenly the fat calories are a huge deal and will cause me to gain.
Now that is for me to lose weight. To maintain, I only add back in nuts, fruits and beans. I still do not eat any sort of potatoes or whole-grain anything. Mainly because they are in a category of carbs (that also includes anything sugary/sweet) that can trigger sweet/binge cravings for me....and increase my hunger...which is the last thing I want or need.
I am truly amazed and impressed by those of you who have great success with calorie-counting. I don't even know how the heck you do it. For me, not only does it not work (no weight loss whatsoever) but I was constantly hungry, ravenous in the evening, and had cravings to binge. Ergo...I don't know how the heck you guys do it this way.
deena
