Quote:
Originally Posted by arumaru
I think the whole "fat acceptance" and "big and beautiful" things stems from completely giving up on losing weight, not thinking it's possible, and just accepting "who you are".
For some people, possibly, but I think there's far more lie in this statement than truth. And it's a lie that is used against fat people who DO like what they see in the mirror or who like themselves (even the teeniest, tinyest bit).
We're told in many ways that a fat person who is not miserable, is a fat person "in denial."
It's garbage - just like many of the other dieting myths that are perpetuated, that makes weight maintenance harder than it has to be.
Sometimes ther'es a grain of truth - in that I discovered and identified with "fat acceptance" rhetoric when I too noticed that dieting only made me fatter. When I didn't diet, my weight was high, but entirely stable - no gains, no losses. When I dieted, I lost temporarily, but any distraction in focus meant a large gain. The fat acceptance rhetoric that dieting is responsible for more fatness, than dieting has ever been responsible for thinness - struck an immediate chord of truth to me.
It rung true, at the time, because "sensible, slow weight loss" wasn't an idea that had much press or popularity. So in part, I was responding to a truth in my life (crash) dieting caused weight gain - only I didn't know that it was only CRASH dieting, because at the time crash dieting was the only option.
At the time, no one, not even doctors were advocating slow weight loss - fat was SO EVIL (in many ways - morally, asthetically, physically - health-wise) you had to get it off AS FAST AS POSSIBLE. Slow weight loss wasn't logical, because it only meant living with fat longer (or so the theory went).
So yes, I did give up on weight loss, because I wasn't aware of the things that made weight loss possible, but it wasn't because primarily that I had (falsely) lost hope, it was because I didn't have the tools (they mostly weren't available at the time - and they're still too rarely discussed today).
Refusing to diet wasn't stupid, it was smart - it was how I found myself able to finally quit gaining. If I hadn't stopped dieting (in the only way I knew how - and in the way even the "experts" were advocating) I bet I would have ended up bed-bound two or three hundred pounds higher than my highest weight.
When I started this weight-loss, I was terrified. I had been diet-free and gain-free for a few years, and in my experience dieting only eventually resulted in weight gain. I knew I couldn't follow my usual path - I had to find a NEW WAY to lose weight. I did a lot of reading, trying to find a weight loss approach that I hadn't tried (or had tried too briefly to determine that it was ineffective).
Ultimately I discovered that low carb (the same low carb that I never gave a chance, because it was SO UNHEALTHY - a criticism that is still rampant) and slow, gradual changes work the best for me. The weight comes off, as long as I follow my plan (but 35 years of being told low-carb is "dangerous," I find it very difficult, even now that I "know" better to stick to the plan, because in the back of my mind I think it's "dangerous" to go too long without eating carbs).
It took months of seeing the evidence to actually accept that I'm allergic or intolerant to wheat. Rash after rash, didn't prove it to me, because I suspected that the idea, found in the low-carb and autoimmune books I was reading, was just anti-grain "propaganda."
Now that I've noticed it, and have been discussing it here and in other forums, and in person with people in my life, I'm being told what I had suspected that it IS just propaganda by folks wanting to sell books. I can't blame those people, I believed it too (and still must to a degree, since I so often test a theory I've proven to myself dozens of times).
There is so much misinformation and half-truths out there, it's a wonder that anyone ever finds a permanent solution to weight loss. The field of weight-loss isn't science yet. It's not even pseudo-science as much as it is superstition and magic.
It's not going to be science for a long time, especially since any attempt at science is so often criticised for giving the obese a reason to stay fat (that's the criticism at any rate to anything that doesn't advocate fairly rapid weight loss as the solution).
I've gone off topic quite a bit, especially as it refers to the main topic. Liking, loving and even finding myself beautiful and loveable (and finding a wonderful man who believes it too) has been critical in my success with weight loss. It irritates me to no end and I'm extremely tired of people telling me (in one way or another) that the very things that are helping me lose weight, are responsible for my being fat. I like myself too much. I don't hate myself enough. I don't hate fat enough. I chose a man who doesn't hate me fat...
I wouldn't lose more weight if those things were true - just my sanity.