![]() |
Your Ideal Weight
I found this "myth" while surfing the net. There is an accompanying ideal weight chart (Located here) which states much lower weight ranges for both women and men. I agree that the Government caters towards unhealthy habits concerning both health and nutrition. I suppose I was just curious if these standards have any other doctors or nutritionist backing the claim? I figured I should check it out before I set my sights on weighing 100 lbs! I would appreciate any feedback.
Thanks, Kimberley |
According to that chart I, at 5' should be below 94 pounds ! That is ridiculous ! I would look like a waif and I can't imagine that I would have much energy,
|
Quote:
|
Um. It says I should weigh 127. When I was a size 6 I was 150lbs. :( I think these are a little low...
|
In my opinion this chart is ridiculous. I'm 5'5" and there is no way I should be below 112 (I'm currently around 130). At my lowest and fittest I was around 118, and I couldn't maintain that for very long. I pretty much ate salad all the time and exercised for about 3 hours 6 days a week. And I looked WAY too skinny. I think my healthiest weight is in the 120s. Don't take this chart too seriously. I'd love to be under 112 and be healthy, but I know it's just not possible. There are other sites that provide healthy weight ranges. For my height I've seen on several sites that I should weigh between 115-150. That's a pretty big range, but I'm sure it depends on many different factors. It's different for everyone.
|
Here's a thread from a while ago that talked about this issue:
http://www.3fatchicks.com/forum/weig...ve-longer.html You should find it interesting... Kira |
Oh my ideal weight is 100 pounds. I guess I should go change my goal ;)
|
Um, yeah, Jillian is 5'2" and weighs 112(from the last report in her bio). So, I suppose she needs to work on her self by these insane charts!!!!!!!
|
I found another height/weight chart that seems to acknowledge the fact that everyone is different. The ranges are wide and based off of the person's frame. I'm medium-framed (according to their chart) and I should weigh between 127 and 141. My goal is 145, so that's not too far off (I've been at 145 a whiles ago and I looked lean and healthy) from their range. Your link is way too low. Even for a small-framed person, that would be bordering on unhealthy-thin. I can't imagine being 112 lbs. I don't think I weighed that much since I was maybe 8 or 9? Holy moly. Talk about unattainable!
|
Sunnigummi -
The link you provided shows my range as 118-132 so I reckon my goal is pretty spot on for me. Thanks :) |
Quote:
when i weighed 125 i was a size 2/4. thats sickening. articles like this further the stereotype that women need to be stick thin. its not okay to be a size 8, 10, or *heaven forbid* 12. you need to be a 0/2/4. being that small is fine for some women, dont get me wrong, but frankly if i need to be 125 just to be HEALTHY, then i guess i need to be 110-115 to be thin. ugh, well im glad i trust my doctor over "green smoothie girl". she also proves her math skills by saying she could gain 35 lbs and still have a healthy BMI when the BMI chart puts the top healthy weight for girls who are 5'8 at 155. unless im forgetting my addition and subtraction... she screwed up. |
Yeah that's totally off. It says at 5'7" I should be 122. My LBM is 116 sooooo unless I'm supposed to be at 5% body fat then no way LOL
|
I am pretty sure I would look too thin at 122. If I could snap my fingers and be that weight though---well, I would be willing to try it on for size. LOL!
|
That does seem awfully low. Mine says at 5'8" I should be 140#, and my goal weight is 150#.
|
Quote:
Also, wtf, "upward-trending" BMI? BMI is BMI, there's not really a way around that. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.