Why would some people who eat pork and red meat consider themselves, "vegetarian"?
Okay so I know the definition of a flexitarian (the vegetarian who might eat the forbidden meats occassionally), the semi-vegetarian (like myself, who occasionally eats white meat such as chicken and turkey and fish), ovo-lacto, etc. But the first two I mentioned are usually deemed not true vegetarians. Usually by the people who consider themselves ovo-lacto, lacto, ovo, and especially the varieties of veganism. However, compared to the over-red meat and pork indulged "American" and some westernized populaces, we are kind of a vegetarian breed and not like the others. So could we technically argue that there's truly is multiple definitions of a vegetarian based on what the "practiced" diet of a meat-loving populace? Now I've mostly lived in and explored southern and midwestern areas of the US, and to my understanding compared to other parts of my country, there's a lot more emphasis on meat products in those areas I'm familiar with, sometimes even to the point where fruit and vegetables are hated and the people who live off of them hated or feared. I still haven't gone overseas but I know some European countries such as England, Scotland, France, and Germany are very big on meats, fats, and dairies, so pretty much being a vegan (except in major metro cities) must be really frowned upon. Okay sorry for my late night babble but basically, I just wanted to know what could actually be considered a vegetarian diet.
Last edited by PrincessKLS; 09-16-2014 at 11:00 PM.
|