Quote:
Originally Posted by berryblondeboys
Why isn't there more information out there on what is a good range? I can't find anythign concrete.
Probably because there is no no one-size-fits-all range. Your carb needs probably vary according to all sorts of variables, genetics, gender, age, health issues, medications, activity level, stress level, diet (where the carbs are coming from) ....
Atkins is the only low-carb plan that I can think of that has guidelines for finding your own best range.
Even though I'm following a low-carb exchange plan rather than Atkins (I need to enforce portion control, as I can stall even on induction level), I learned alot about finding my best carb level from Atkins.
Most people forget or ignore this about Atkins. I think because the plan allows a person to extend induction, some people take that to mean everyone should (which I don't think at all was Dr. Atkins' intention).
I made that mistake, many times over the years, whenever I tried Atkins. I tried the diet several times over the decades, and never made it much past 4 or 5 weeks. I think I made it almost two months once, but I'm not sure. As it turns out, I do not recover from "induction flu." Even after 5 weeks on induction, I still felt horrible, and was even passing out (probably from low blood sugar). At the time, I thought it was proof that Atkins was unhealthy, and because the book encouraged long-term induction, I never considered progress to OWL. This is my fault, because it was clear from the book that I had the option to progress to OWL (adding 5g of carbs per week until I found my perfect level for my goals - a steady, but comfortably paced weight loss).
If I had followed OWL as instructed, those symptoms would have disappeared. Maybe at 45g of carbs, maybe at 100g (the book makes it clear that OWL carb levels can vary tremendously from person to person).
Atkins never mentions that induction flu might be due to low-blood sugar issues, or that some people can't stay on induction. Now whether he thought that it wasn't an issue, or didn't want to confuse readers, I don't know. I just know that if I had realized that prolonged induction flu symptoms could be cured with OWL, I would have gone on to OWL (which I learned for myself only when my doctor told me to try low-carb, but not too-low, but admitted he didn't know what was too-low).
I ended up having to leave Atkins, because it's based on recognizing hunger, and I've learned that I just cannot. I can eat even induction level and still stall weight loss, because of false hunger and portion-control issues. For me "translating" low-carb into an exchange plan works better for me.
Surprisingly (or maybe not to dedicated low-carbers), I'm finding that my own best carb level is far lower than I would have ever expected. I find that grains don't work for me at all. I do ok if I limit them to at most one serving a day, and choose the highest protein grains (like quinoa). I do better on two or three servings a week.
There are some very good books that explain why grains are not a necessary food group (in fact, grains contain "anti-nutrients" which pull other nutrients from the body. So a "balanced diet" with grains can look very different than a "balanced diet" without them).