Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2011, 01:15 PM   #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southeast
Posts: 75

S/C/G: 201/201/135

Height: 5'6"

Default Body Fat Percentage

Hi All

Can someone tell me the best (easiest) way to determine body fat percentage? I have one of those scales that's supposed to tell you, but the thing has a mind of it's own. I have a new weight-only scale coming tomorrow.

Should I be worried about body fat percentage at all? I guess I don't know much about it.

Thanks for any info!
kcnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:19 PM   #2  
Moderating Mama
 
mandalinn82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 11,712

S/C/G: 295/200/175

Height: 5' 8"

Default

Unfortunately, the "best" and the "easiest" ways are not the same!

The easiest way is probably one of the body fat scales...but they don't tend to be as accurate, can react strangely depending on your amount of hydration, etc.

The "best" way is probably hydrostatic weighing, which is both expensive and not that common. It's accurate, but not a good every day choice for people.

As long as you're getting exercise, eating a healthy diet, and losing weight, it's a good bet that your body fat percentage is dropping, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
mandalinn82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:21 PM   #3  
Calorie Counter
 
Jesse Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Myer's Park
Posts: 258

S/C/G: 250 (Sept 2009)/177/150

Height: 5' 9"

Default

There's two ways to measure body fat. One is a caliper test and the other is waist circumference. I like either of those better than the scale thing because I have a large chest. The scale doesn't account for large boobs but the other two tests do. You can get an estimate at freedieting.com. That estimate made me feel so much better than the fancy scale.
Jesse Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:44 PM   #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
kcnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Southeast
Posts: 75

S/C/G: 201/201/135

Height: 5'6"

Default

Thanks! I did the estimate on the website and it said I'm 28%. I think I can live with that for now
kcnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 01:54 PM   #5  
Calorie Counter
 
Jesse Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Myer's Park
Posts: 258

S/C/G: 250 (Sept 2009)/177/150

Height: 5' 9"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcnc View Post
Thanks! I did the estimate on the website and it said I'm 28%. I think I can live with that for now
Mine was 23% according to the website. According to the fancy scale, it's 36%. I'll definitely take the website's number over the dang scale.
Jesse Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:14 PM   #6  
Senior Member
 
Petite Powerhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 570

S/C/G: 129/108/108

Height: 5' 3 1/2"

Default

Waist circumference is a good measure of visceral fat—and that is quite useful for determining certain health risks—but I don't believe that it is a very accurate measure of body fat percentage. People come in all shapes and sizes. Thus, waist size alone does not provide a real indication of overall body proportion. Usually, you would need to combine this measurement with bust, hip, forearm, neck, and such measurements to improve the accuracy. Even then, this is not always one of the best ways to determine body fat percentage. Certainly, it isn't something someone with a lot of muscle would want to go by.

Body fat scales are also not too exacting, as they are affected by dehydration and muscle mass, for example. The best way to measure body fat is with calipers or by immersion in water.

Last edited by Petite Powerhouse; 01-11-2011 at 02:30 PM.
Petite Powerhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:18 PM   #7  
Calorie counter
 
Eliana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,679

Height: 5'4.5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petite Powerhouse View Post
Waist circumference is a good measure of visceral fat—and that is quite useful for determining certain health risks—but I don't believe that it is a very accurate measure of body fat percentage. People come in all shapes and sizes. Waist size alone does not provide an indication of overall body proportion.
The navy uses a neck, waist and hip (for women) ratio. I like that one, but it doesn't take into account the fat in my ridiculous chest. Surely I have a higher body fat percentage than someone less well endowed than me.
Eliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 02:28 PM   #8  
Going the rest of the way
 
maalisse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 496

S/C/G: 188/ticker/135

Height: 5'5"

Default

Hrm, that waist measurement site puts me at 8.88% body fat. Sounds off to me! I'm closer to 24% using skin calipers, 26% with a body fat scale.

Last edited by maalisse; 01-11-2011 at 02:29 PM.
maalisse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:52 PM   #9  
Strong is the new Pretty!
 
FitGirlyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Arkansas
Posts: 2,237

S/C/G: 245/ticker/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

I would love to believe the number from the estimate site, but it is way off. While the scales are not accurate they are closer than that.

Jesse, I am sorry, but when it comes to BF% breasts count.

The best way is either the water method or the body scan thing that you may have seen on Biggest Loser. The problem is that both of these things are expensive and it's hard to find a place that does them.

If you belong to a gym ask them if they have someone to measure for you. If not ask your doc. That still won't be as good as the expensive methods, but it will be better than a home scale. For the record, my little home scale is only off from the fancy machine at the gym by about 1.5-2%.
FitGirlyGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 04:04 PM   #10  
Calorie Counter
 
Jesse Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Myer's Park
Posts: 258

S/C/G: 250 (Sept 2009)/177/150

Height: 5' 9"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FitGirlyGirl View Post
Jesse, I am sorry, but when it comes to BF% breasts count.
My former doctor disagrees to a point because I've already had a reduction and they don't change when I lose or gain weight. I've been a DD since my reduction and they just don't change. If I'm happier with the waist estimate, it's better for me. If I take the number on the scale I'll give up or stop eating again. I'm kind of becoming an extremist with my weight issues. Yes, I know, I need to, and am, working on it. I guess I should just not hold stock in body fat percentages because mine will always be skewed.
Jesse Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 04:42 PM   #11  
Senior Member
 
Petite Powerhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 570

S/C/G: 129/108/108

Height: 5' 3 1/2"

Default

Some breasts are largely breast tissue. Others are largely fat. It depends.
Petite Powerhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:19 PM   #12  
Calorie Counter
 
Jesse Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Myer's Park
Posts: 258

S/C/G: 250 (Sept 2009)/177/150

Height: 5' 9"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petite Powerhouse View Post
Some breasts are largely breast tissue. Others are largely fat. It depends.
I would guess because of the reduction and the fact that mine just don't change, I fall into the former versus the latter. As I've said before, I'm wearing two bras that I've owned since 2008 and I started this journey in Sept 2009 and they both still fit. When I replaced one in June, I bought the exact same size/brand and it fit perfectly. I would guess if they were fatty, I'd have lost them as consistently as I've lost inches around my waist and hips.
Jesse Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:25 PM   #13  
Senior Member
 
stacygee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,284

S/C/G: 264/202/163

Height: 5'4"

Default

So on that freediet.com it said my lean weight was 135.5. If my goal is 132 is my goal too low?
stacygee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:36 PM   #14  
Strong is the new Pretty!
 
FitGirlyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Arkansas
Posts: 2,237

S/C/G: 245/ticker/1??

Height: 5'2"

Default

Fat tissue is fat tissue. It is not a question of it being a good thing or a bad thing. We have to have a certain level of it to live, and that level varies between people. Body Fat % is not a judgment thing, it is simply raw data. When measuring it, every fat cell counts. The thing about large breasts is that if a woman is very large breasted (and it is not solely due to being extremely overweight) then docs will tell you that she can be healthy at a higher BF% than a smaller breasted woman. However, the fat tissue in the breasts still counts as body fat. I understand the frustration. I am large breasted too. At one point as a teen I got down to a size 3 (for a very short time) and I was still a DD.

The breasts being a mix of fat tissue and other tissue is true of course, but the fat tissue in breasts still counts as body fat. I would think that if your breasts are less fatty (and if they don't change much then they very well may be) that they wouldn't skew the machines much anyhow.

I personally think that each individual should always use whatever measurements and tracking items keep them encouraged and moving in the right direction. If BF% doesn't do it for you then use other things. Waist/Hip ratio is a really good one to use, especially for women, especially if you are at all concerned about heart issues. I personally track as many things as I can. I figure that if I am not currently seeing success with one thing then maybe I'll see it somewhere else and therefore not get discouraged.
FitGirlyGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:41 PM   #15  
Senior Member
 
niafabo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 835

S/C/G: 254/181/165

Height: 5'7.5"

Default

Not sure about the accuracy of the freedieting.com test or any tape measuring tests. It say's I'm 28.5% and other tests put me at anywhere from27.5% all the way up to 42.3% it entirely depends on what method you use. If I were you I would just try not to worry about it too much.
niafabo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Body Fat Percentage Calculator Here we go again 20-Somethings 16 10-25-2008 11:31 PM
What's your BODY FAT Percentage? Have you checked it lately? bambifox Weight Loss Support 21 04-05-2008 04:45 PM
What's your BODY FAT Percentage? Have you checked it lately? bambifox Carb Counters 46 03-31-2008 10:30 PM
Body Fat Percentage ^^Angel^^ UK Fat Chicks 13 10-23-2005 06:46 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.