Thanks for the replies, I appreciate any help I can get with this.
I put in 104 bpm as resting heart rate because I put on the monitor when I woke up yesterday, I sat in bed and watched TV then read a book for a little while. The whole time, the reading stayed around 104. I figured I was sitting in bed, not moving.
That, and every doctor's visit, and every time I've taken it on my own, my pulse is somewhere between 105 and 110, so I thought that was my normal heart rate.
Anyway, I decided to leave the monitor on for 24 hours to see what kind of statistics I can get. I woke up this morning with the monitor on, and found my bpm was at 70, then a few seconds later was hovering around 82-85. When I sat up in bed, it was around 102-107.
An update on the calorie count: As of this post, I've been monitoring for 20hrs and 4 minutes. Calories burned are a ridiculous 4214. I didn't exercise at all, other than just going to the mall yesterday, which can certainly not be described as exercise. I slept 8 hours of that, and the rest of the time, I was online for a little while, then I pretty much sat in bed. (I've got chronic pain issues) Nothing vigorous.
So here's my question: If I'm supposedly burning over 4000 calories per day, and I'm eating exactly (yes, I count it all) 1300-1600 calories per day, why aren't I dropping 6 or so pounds a week? Right now, I lose around 1 pound per week. I think the monitor's calorie count is way off.
I went back and checked Jillian's "winning by losing" book, and did my BMR and AMR using her formula, and the results came in a little differently than when I used the online calclulator. Using the book, I got: 1578 BMR and 1736 AMR.
I'm completely stumped. The only logical thing I can think of is that I'm simply not burning over 4000 calories like the monitor says I am.
What do you think?