This was a really interesting post. Like you said this seems more philosophical than physical (per se). I went to a website that showed what 200 calories looked like in different things (carrots, bbacon, bread) and I was shocked at how much vegetable I could have versus bacon or pasta....but I like bacon or pasta.
In terms or world eating particularly places where people don't have the food we have obvious more is better (bacon versus vegetables) but I want to eat what I want to eat....which I think is sort of IE-ish....
Yes I could force myself to eat tofu, and salad and bean sprouts because I can have more and they are good for me..but I don't want to. I know it sounds childish...but I think at this point when (not if) I make my goal weight I will most like follow IE forever Philosopically(sp?) and Physically. I think its different if you don't have the choice.
Another things though is as I follow IE I try and buy more organic, natural foods (they are high though) and naturally I am making the choice to eat better, but every now and gain I want some bacon and pasta..
Ok, not ever sure I responded to your post correctly but there it is.....
Nice to see people coming back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spinymouse
I was not thinking of fasting specifically for weight loss but more as a philosophical thing. I may come across as being too harsh here, and sometimes when I express myself I sound inadvertently nasty, (I apologize in advance) but here goes.
I am getting so sick of consumerism (in the case of food, that means literally consume-rism!) Someone referred me to the Hungry-Girl website where one example of what you can find there is "you can have 20 times as much Tofu Shirataki for the same number of calories as spaghetti." Now I ask is this really what we want??? Is our goal to not be fat, while eating as much food as we can, and not be fat? If so, why is this the goal? I find it sort of disgusting. I find it disgusting if we are talking either about calories or total volume of food. Suppose if I use every "trick" in the book whether it be supplements that increase the metabolism, timing of eating, whatever, and by doing so I can maintain an ideal body weight of 120 lbs eating 1800 calories a day. So what?? Is that really any better than maintaining an ideal body weight of 120 pounds by eating only 1000 calories a day? My metabolism is already slow from some of the meds I take but I think that's fine; it means I don't have to eat so much. Why does everybody want to eat so much? Ok, I am in many ways a minimalist. I drive a Honda Civic hybrid and I love how I don't have to keep feeding it gas all the time. I don't have a lot of clothes and I like knowing I don't have the type of career that demands that I have a lavish wardrobe. Why should it be any different with food? Less food = less stuff to think about. That's what my intuition tells me anyway! When I was a kid, eating was my least favorite thing to do. I remember that, and I'd like to go back to that part of being a kid. So, for reasons of disgust and rebellion perhaps, I'd like to fast for awhile. Ok, maybe I could throw in some spiritual side interests in it as well.