Quote:
Originally Posted by Annik
And it is also the reason that alkanylized (sp?) can make a big difference for some people.
H20 therefore is not all just H20!
......................................
And about aspartame?
..........................................
If you are interested more in the truth about aspartame than you are about condemning Mercola as a quack, I urge you to explore further afield and see what new studies are saying about aspartame.
Sorry. On this one, emerging science just doesn't back you up!
By attacking Mercola instead of the issue, you are really just dodging the issue.
Annik
Ummm. I'm sorry Annik, actually its not a fallacy to attack one's "appeal to authority" when the other person appeals to an authority figure
That said, there isn't valid, peer reviewed science to back up any of what YOU and Mercola are saying,
so I issue you the same challenge: Bring some research papers/links to the actual research, in peer reviewed journals, that back up the claim that aspartame is single-handedly resposible for all the evils in the world (cancer, obesity, etc)... The evidence collected so far just doesnt support this. Yes, there are *some* indications that it (aspartame) *might* be interpretted by the body IN SOME PEOPLE as sugar. There have been studies, in LAB RIGHTS, who are fed un godly amounts of the stuff, that then develope issues.
Fine. Im not saying aspartame is good. im not saying its bad. I'm saying, don't accuse others of having NOT done their research, when they are not the ones citing a .COM as their source.
End rant. I realize that John can speak up for himself.
Annik- i am not slamming or attacking you, so my apologies that it seems that way. To paraphrase John's tag,, and first Kaplods) misinformation is rampant in this day and age
Meghan