Quote:
Originally Posted by junebug41
I'm of the mindset that any activity is good activity. I can be more phsyically tired after a 2 hour walk than a 45 minute run (it's also harder on my knees to walk that long).
However, it's all about keeping your heart rate up, which walking may not always accomplish. So if it's weight loss you're after I would take a look at how hard you're "working". Perhaps incorperate wearing a heartrate monitor to up the ante?
But really, I will take a 2 hour walk through Scotland in Autumn over a run any day
This!
What matters the most in that hour or two is what your heart rate is doing. A lower heart rate means you're going to burn less calories. A higher heart rate? You'll burn more. There is no way I can accomplish the same amount of calories burned in walking for an hour than I would with running for an hour. Running is just harder and gets my heart rate much higher than walking. But if you enjoy it, and you have the time to walk 2 hours, then by all means, do it.
There are times that walking is preferred, but in more cases than not, the impatient side of me would rather
run the same distance, burn more calories and finish exercising in less time!