This stems from reading the body fat% threads that are going around right now.
My goal weight of 140 was based on having 30% body fat at 165lbs (calculated with bioimpedence). My lean body mass, then, was about 115.5 lbs. That's almost 50lbs of fat. If I lost 25lbs of fat to reach 140, then I would have 25lbs of fat left, and 25/140 is 18% body fat.
I've been jogging, biking, and spinning to lose the weight, along with a little bit of lifting a couple times a week. At 155lbs, I used the same Omicron to measure my bf% and it was 29%. If those readings are accurate, that meant I lost 5lbs of lean body mass and 5lbs of fat. This kind of jives with my qualitative personal experience-- I don't feel any more toned at 155 than I did back when I was gaining all the weight, and my low weight was about 130.
Is anybody having an experience where their lifting is actually offsetting their muscle burn, and they are losing almost purely fat? If so, how much do you do? I just added a new lifting routine for my upper body that I hope will help slow the muscle loss, but I just don't think that determining your lean body mass and then basing your goal weight on losing *only* fat is a very effective method. It just seems inevitable that you are going to lose lean body mass because it is so hard to keep-- after the age of 20 women start naturally shedding muscle unless we actively try to stop it, so we have nature working against us.