Quote:
Originally Posted by Meg
My doctor wrote an impassioned plea to my insurance company and it didn't do any good at all. He says that he's never seen insurance coverage for anyone who didn't have WLS -- but that WLS patients are frequently covered. OK, we saved the insurance companies how much $$ by not having surgery? And now we can't get coverage for the excess skin?
Yep, it's bullcrap.
My gripe exactly Meg! I mean c'mon already, hellooooooo!

And I don't know why it bothers me so much considering I don't even have insurance. So its not like this particular bit of pure stupidity will ever affect me personally since I can't be turned down by something I don't even have, but its just the principle of the thing, y'know? Why
don't we get the same rights as WLS patients? Do you think its because we non-WLS patients didn't permanently alter the way our bodies will function for the rest of our lives, so they figure we have such a higher likelihood of regaining the weight that they won't even bother taking the risk by insuring our reconstructive surgery? Its the only explanation that makes sense to me, what do ya'll think?

BTW, nothing against WLS or WLS patients of course, I say more power to ‘em if they can get their skin removal covered, my problem is with the insurance companies getting to decide who gets to be “normalized” and who doesn’t. Its just not right!

Okay, rant over, thank you for indulging me!
Beverly