I may be opening a can of worms here, but I have to ask if I am getting the wrong impression of the general veg*n view (if there is such a thing) on non-veg*n lifestyles.
I ask, not to start an argument, but because as I have been searching for meat alternatives in my diet, I have encountered some very (one scary) hostile encounters with veg*n friends and aquaintances online and in-person, and even on this forum, feel a little like I might be trespassing here.
For example last year a vegetarian coworker brought in meatless buffalo wings for a unit potluck. OMG, they were SOO good, so I started talking to him about the nugget brand, and we were discussing meatless brands and uses for tvp. I admitted that I add tvp to small amounts of meat, and he begain giving me tips to give up meat completely. When he learned that I wasn't trying to give up meat entirely, it sort of shut down the conversation, and affected our conversations from then on.
I've had similar experiences in health food stores, and with friends trying to convert me. It's almost like to a number of (mostly) vegans that I'm "worse" than the average meateater, because I am "pretending" to be sympathetic, or that I somehow should know better, having seen the alternative. I don't feel I am pretending anything. I know my views are a little different than both sides' mainstream views, but I'm not hiding them, or pretending to be something I'm not. In fact, when I don't make it clear that I'm not trying to eventually give up meat, I'm often treated much more sympathetically than when I don't let people believe I am either veg*n or headed that direction.
Personally, I believe that Americans eat too much meat, and do not take as good care of our meat animals as we are should, mostly out of greed. However, I also believe that it is no more unethical for a human to eat meat as it is for a bear, though because we have a choice, knowing that your meat came from small farms that treat their animals well and kill humanely is the best choice. I also try to think of meat eating in the "paleolithic" way. Prehistoric people had to do a lot of work to get their meat, so I don't believe in eating like a hunter if you're a couch potoato. At my activity level, I wouldn't be able to catch or kill much "prey," so my goal is to try to eat like a gatherer.
This view doesn't seem very popular with many of the veg*ns in my life (or the defensive carnivores either). Is it all in my imagination, that I am feeling pressure to "choose sides," or that I am not welcome to discuss veg*n food or issues if I am not commited to at least eventually becoming veg*n.
Do you think I am unintentionally doing something to offend people, or is this just an issue that a few people find very sensitve? Is there a better way for me to communicate? Is it ok to post here if I'm not veg*n, and should I mention in each post that I'm not?


). Keep up the good work 
I love that you're posting! If there were ever confusion, you or someone else could easily point out that you were not a vegetarian, right? It's not an issue, to me.
I commend you on your choice to do less harm! I'm kind of similar to you, because I never intend to go completely vegan, but I do try to cut down on animal products. I think the "pretend to be sympathetic" accusation applies only if you say you're something you're not, such as if you were to say you're vegan when you're not.
Or, "You probably think you're a nice person, but you hurt my feelings just now, and since you occasionally hurt people's feelings, you're not nice, you're just a rotten scumbag!" 

