I know that monitoring what I eat is a lifelong thing, which is why I haven't opted for a programme that severely restricts or pushes to excess any one food group. Ultra-low fat does not work for me--I find that a reasonable amount of fat is what makes food appetising, and filling, to me. With very few exceptions, I don't care for FF or LF versions: if I can't fit a particular food into my plan, I'd rather go without than compromise on the taste. I'm proud of myself for cutting out butter completely though
. I had a block in the fridge when I started this and it's still there! I won't admit to how much I used to get through.... 
I usually choose whole-grain over processed carbs, but I haven't yet totally given up my white Basmati rice.
I buy it in big sacks so perhaps when it runs out, I'll completely switch over to whole-grain.I don't consciously try to fit my food choices into any particular model, but I do periodically check retroactively to see where I am within the food groups. When I'm OP, it just happens that I'm eating in the region of:
- carbohydrate: 45-50%
- protein: 25-30%
- fat: 25%

A friend of mine has had a fantastic weight reduction (95 lbs) after following a nine month plan averaging 20% carb, 60% protein, 20% fat. Beats me how she stuck to this, but she did. The problem she's facing now is that she gains weight with just the slightest increase in carbs. Can it really be healthy for her to stay with this ratio for ever?


Thank you all for sharing it with me.
Lots of food for thought there--and not one kcal in any of it!

That made me laugh!