Quote:
Originally Posted by thefulldarby
To answer your question Jesslan, I'm 5' 9'. It's odd you bring that up as I notice that sometimes when I'm around 1200 calories and I workout hard (burn around 500 calories) that I can't sleep at night depsite any meds I may take. My resting caloric rate is around 1900 but I have a job where I sit on my rear all day. Think I may need to up my calories? Thanks!
If your resting metabolic rate is 1900 calories, that means without doing any activity at all, just laying still, you are burning 1900 calories. That's similar to my number (1836, I just checked).
Thing is, even with a sedentary lifestyle (driving to work, sitting at a desk, etc) you're burning some calories. With a sedentary lifestyle you apply a factor of 1.2 to your BMR (Resting/"Base" Metabolic rate). For me that puts my daily caloric need at 2204 in order to maintain my current weight with a sedentary lifestyle. However, I fall into the "lightly active" category because of commuting on foot every day, so I apply a factor of 1.375 for a total of 2525 calories in order to maintain.
From there I have to decide how quickly I want to lose weight. In order to lose one pound per week, I would need to reduce my maintenance calories down by 3500 per week (500 per day), so I would eat 2025 per day in order to lose at a rate of one pound per week. To lose two pounds per week I would have to reduce to 1525.
For myself, I've decided I want to lose 3-4 pounds per month, which is less than one per week. So I have adjusted my average caloric intake to 2100 and I try to keep it right around average, eating over my calories some days and under on others.
Now, it may be tempting to say that based on those numbers I could lose 2.5 pounds or more per week by reducing my calories to, say, 1250... but there are problems with that.
First, the whole "minimum requirement is 1200 calories" thing is arbitrary and does not apply to everyone. My thought is that it applies best to women of low/average height. There are probably a few women (literally only a very small number) who could do fine on less, whether to maintain or lose weight, and I suspect people with dwarfism or some other genetic/etc differences could fall into that category as well. But for someone above average height, you should not have to eat that "minimum" to lose weight, and it's probably not healthy to do so.
Another consideration is that your body will have an easier time adjusting to changes if they happen more slowly. This means if you lose as slowly as possible, you will have an easier time getting to your goal weight (trust me, there is a HUGE difference between eating 2100 and 1600 calories in a day!) and an easier time staying there.
But you need to figure out where your body is at.
So here's my suggestion:
Up your calories to around 1800/day, for about 3 weeks. Every day, first thing in the morning after using the washroom, weigh yourself and enter the data into a spreadsheet set up just for the date and your weight.
Once three (or more) weeks have passed, move all the data to a graph and apply a trend line using an automatic function (available in excel or google drive spreadsheets). Completely ignore the actual data points and just focus on the trend line. You should be able to tell if the trend line is moving up or down, and by approximately how much. If you gain one pound in those weeks (again, looking at the trend line not the data points), that means over the course of the three+ weeks you've had 3500 calories more than you needed in order to maintain.
My guess is that at 1800 calories over that period of time (if you're logging items correctly and not accounting for exercise, although no need to exercise), you will lose at least a pound. That's based on your height of 5'9 and that you're male, although I do not know your body composition. If you have a high body fat percentage (and not much lean mass), then you will need to eat fewer calories.