I've done a lot of reading across the forum to address the issue of diet soda consumption and didn't feel I could find a good summary. There seem to be a few different categories by which people indicate they should be avoided with passion. I'm not here to say I believe we should be bathing in the diet drinks, but I am curious if they shouldn't be viewed as "restricted" instead of banned.
One argument is about the sweetener. I am not here to argue with whether or not Splenda, Stevia, Aspartame, etc. are good or bad. I've read many posts today saying how evil aspartame is, with many observational associations, for example possibly relating to migraines and possibly triggering insulin surges in some people. Again, I'm not saying one sweetener is evil, though it seems most favor Stevia. I read an article listed on the 3FC site today which showed there wasn't an association between an insulin spike and aspartame, though I think the study could be criticized for small sample size. In short, it seems the sweetener choice should be a personal one, as some people are *very* concerned about a natural approach, while others seem less troubled by it. So, if the main reason to ban vs restrict diet sodas is based on sweetener, I do not believe the argument holds water IMHO. Again, it's a personal decision if you want the product or not, but my alternative IP program will allow rare aspartame as a restricted item. Another article I read on the 3FC today mentioned an association between diet soda and metabolic syndrome. Unfortunately, it was an observational study based on self-reporting. As such, it should not be viewed as proving causality and should *only* be used for hypothesis generating. What is needed is a true study designed in a randomized, blinded fashion. Unfortunately, that will never happen, so we are left with observational data and a need the general rule of moderation.
Another argument is about the damning affects of carbonation. I find it hard to believe that 1 or 2 diet sodas will have enough impact on the body's acid/base homeostasis. I am away from my main computer, so I am not able to delve into this enough. The essential components of acid/base homeostasis in the body involves the lungs rapid ability, which blow off excess carbon dioxide (a method of removing bicarbonate), and the kidneys powerful (though slower) buffer system. So, I welcome real data to say why someone having one or two diet sodas can possibly overwhelm the healthy body's acid/base homeostasis. Yes, I've read that brown soda has more phosphoric acid. Again, it seems to be another acid/base issue that the lungs and kidneys of the average healthy adult should be able to address without difficulty. I'd love to see real science about how the very low level of phosphate in the average soda (~40-60mg vs body's daily need of 700mg -- Livestrong website numbers) could be harmful. So, for my IP alternative, I'll be considering diet soda a "restricted" item (EVERYTHING in moderation!).
One side note. If the body is heavily relying on the lungs to blow of extra carbon dioxide for acid/base homeostasis, the very morbidly obese need to know of something called obesity hypoventillation. In short, the rib cage cannot expand enough due to massive weight pulling down on the ribs, limiting the body's ability to take in and expel a full breath. So, be sure to be mobile and not a couch potato, ensuring full, deep breaths and prevent feeling short of breath due to obesity hypoventillation.


) drinker before starting IP. 2 cans a day most days. I completely cut it out cold turkey since going OP, but there are times when I wonder what the harm of having one would be. I personally am not upset by aspartame or other chemicals (you can't really be too concerned with chemicals and eat packets of food every day, IMO) but my fear is that I'd be that one person who would have one and it would throw me out of ketosis. 