Quote:
Originally Posted by pointless2011
Well I didn't mean that I eat alot of them, I just eat a fruit with almost every meal. I do count and write down what I eat, that's why I'm so confused about it.. But yeah, so sugar in fruit is not as bad as regular sugar? Or am I not understanding this right?
Sugar is sugar. The sugar in fruit is just as bad (and just as good) as sugar in a candy bar. It has just as many calories per gram. With fruit (as opposed to say a candybar or a can of soda) you're just likely to get more good things WITH the sugar (water, fiber, vitamins, antioxidants and other phytochemicals), and you're (usually) getting more food (by volume and weight) for the calorie. Because of the calorie density, it's much easier to eat 500 calories of candy than it is to eat 500 calories of fruit. The fiber in the fruit helps fill you faster, so you generally eat less. That's why fruit juice isn't much better than Kool-Aid. You get the antioxidants and vitamins, but not the filling fiber.
I think you're looking for a hard and fast answer, and there isn't one. Nutrition is a science of grays - there is no universally healthy diet, but if you keep a food journal, you can determine what works best for you.
Firstly, I think your weight loss is fine - excellent in fact. Losing .5% of your body weight per week, is actually quite good (and you're losing almost .7%).
Also remember that not everyone loses weight in a consistent pattern. And while most people do seem to lose the most in the first few weeks of a diet, that's not universal either. Many people will lose nothing for the first month or so and then will start losing. Some people lose consistently and gradually, other people lose in spurts (what many people here call whooshes).
You can't judge your diet by two weeks (and probably not even two months).
Most people don't want to wait two months to see weight loss, so they tend to make larger chanages. That's great, but it's not always possible when you don't have a lot of weight to lose.
When you have less than 40 lbs to lose, you have to be more precise than if you were much heavier. The difference between losing weight and gaining or not losing - can be as few as 200 calories - two apples. (I'm not saying cut out the apples, just that your metabolism may require fewer calories than you think it does).
Online calorie calculators are only guesstimates based on average. Many people burn far more, and many burn far less than the calculators estimate. Over the years for myself, I've noticed that the calculators overestimate (more each year) my calorie needs. Some calculators have estimated the calories at which I supposedly should maintain my weight, anywhere from 2500 - 4500. Even the lowest estimate is too high. Based on my food journals, I stop losing at around 2300 calories (a little higher if I eat lower carb).
Many people find no difference in weight loss between low-carb and high-carb eating. You may lose equally well on 1200 calories of fruit as on 1200 calories of fish. Some people don't. I have to keep carbohydrates reasonably low or I tend not to lose weight (but not just because of the carb levels, though. Sugars also tend to make me hungrier for more sugars, and to overeat in general).
Without knowing everything you eat, it's hard to even guess what you need to change (if anything at all, because your weight loss has been GOOD so far).
If you can see a dietitian, I'd recommend it. He or she can help you evaluate your whole diet, and can also help you make the best choices overall. Another good option would be to read a book or two about basic nutrition (and maybe for fun, a book on superfoods - but don't let it make you think that you must eat only foods listed as superfoods, or that you have to eat as many as you possibly can cram into your diet).