Quote:
Originally Posted by ilidawn
MiZTaCCen I think you're absolutely right that it's a lot (if not mostly) to do with what kids are doing at home. I don't really think smaller classes is the best way though. I remember being in the top classes overseas with great grades but all the classes (about 9 or 10 per grade) had between 30-40 students and our teachers did well with us. I don't know what to attribute it to..maybe kids just aren't serious enough (not getting the support at home either) or maybe the teachers need to learn how to focus their time on the class while setting aside enough time to give one on one help when they see a kid's having troubles catching on with a topic.
I think a lot of schools and districts are afraid to hold students back due to loss or reduction of federal, state and local funds. Money is what it all boils down to, not the quality of education.
I think schools should be allowed to hold students back if they need to be without financial punishment. This keeps students in the same grade on a more level field. Obviously, there will still be differences, there always will be. But I've seen fifth graders reading fairly advanced books in classes with others that couldn't get through Curious George. This takes time away from those that need
a little extra help getting back on track.
The standards shouldn't be lowered for the few. Maybe if this were the case, they wouldn't feel the need to shove standardized testing down every one's throats. What would be the point if federal funds didn't hang on having the absolute highest percentage of students pass? I remember taking those tests and they were a JOKE. I was finished in 15 minutes and bored the rest of the flippin day. Maybe, just maybe, the kids could have their recess back without the need for "more instruction time."
I'm not saying this will solve the education system's problems, but it sure isn't working like a well-oiled machine as is.
[/end

]