After doing research, I decided that aiming for an average of 1500 calories a day would suit me well. Overall, it has; I've lost weight well and haven't suffered any major hunger in a month on plan--until tonight. I went over 1500 for the first time in a month and it's sooo weighing on me (no pun intended).
I should have been asleep an hour and a half ago, but I am just bedeviled by winding up at 1628 calories on the day. Logically, I know I shouldn't be beating myself up for it--I told myself when I started down this road that I was aiming for an average, NOT looking at 1500 as the last step before a precipitous drop into the pit of abject failure. I don't gnash my teeth at the days that I've been under. If I'd eaten 1372 calories, I'd be fine with that as long as they were nutrition-packed; why should 128 calories cause such anxiety if they're on the other side of my target?
Nothing I ate was off plan. I just had a late-night snack of a vegetable curry (no rice) that put me over the line. It got recorded before it even hit the microwave. I was fine with exceeding my target calories before I ate. But now I'm struck with "eater's remorse" despite not having gone off my stated plan. It's especially frustrating because the whole point of having a target range instead of a do-or-die, rigid limit is that such limits have previously led me to consider a small slip a good reason to binge; I wanted to avoid that kind of all-or-nothing thinking.
And here I am, chewing my lip and regretting a few ounces of spicy veggies. Logic tells me this is stupid because my plan allows "over" days and "under" days as long as my week's average is 1500 or below. Emotion tells me to get on the hamster wheel and pedal off those 128 calories, but I don't want to use exercise in a punitive way.
Does anyone else do this? Are there zig-zaggers out there who don't mind their zigs, but agonize over their zags? How do others deal with a target range--or do you set yourself a rigid limit past which you never stray?


