Thankyou very much, these are very helpful.
On the WOE's forum, I got some good advice too and was nearly surfacing, then someone posted some links to threads "to inspire you".
These turned out to be threads she'd started to talk about how much she'd lost (about twice as much as I have) in the same length of time, despite regularly cheating, and many people's praise of what she'd achieved.
This made me cross - I'd already posted that that was part of my disappointment, that others do better for less effort.
I congratulated her on her loss but pointed out that hers was not the most tactful of posts. She is now all angry and defensive, and says it's not working because it's my own fault. I've temporarily withdrawn!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronzeager
Let us rant together then, because I only lose one pound a week too, and that is by scrabbling back every miserable calorie. Today I reduced my daily almond ration from 15 to seven to try to bring my daily total lower.
I am sorry but that did make me smile: I too have stood there, counting shreds of grated cheese out of a dish to get the right weight!
Quote:
1) I have a chart, with a line plotting my weight, which I check about every week or so. The line does not go very steeply downward, but it does go downward. Always. (If necessary, I do not record any entries until I have a "downward" entry to put in.)
I like the idea of only recording the downward points. I'll see if I can work out a way to record my intake on DietPower without a graph showing up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by caryesings
My take on it is the folks that pull big starting numbers were the ones who dramatically improved their WOE. You, my friend, have been at this dieting thing for a while so your body long ago dumped the "easy" weight.
I guess, although my diet immediately pre this restart was pretty hideous, almost deep-fried mars bar sandwiches on white bread.....
Quote:
Then there's the age thing. I don't think it's those of us in the 50+ crowd who can cheat and still lose. I would suspect that at your height and age that 1600 calories (that I think you had posted in another thread) might not be that much lower than what your body needs to maintain your current weight so it will take more days to add up to the 3500 calorie deficit needed for 1 lb. loss.
But with age also comes the wisdom that a healthy way of eating and exercising is better for your body no matter what the size and if you stick with it, the size WILL change.
OK, I can see that, good point. I will try and drop a couple of hundred calories while sticking to the WOE and see if it helps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochester
My mantra is "Even if your progress seems slow, just remember: if you're eating right and exercising, you are healthier today than you were a week ago."
And for me, health is more important than numbers on a scale. I refuse to starve myself or do some freaky crash diet just to get skinny.
That is true. Joints, skin and mood (usually

) are vastly improved.
Part of my anxiety is that I am doing something so freakydeaky that I'm damaging my body. Lots of people lose weight and live healthily low carb for ever, don't they?
BTW, what does the IR in your plan mean?
Thankyou all again.