Meg, great job with your shoulder!
Bill, I heard about the water main (I have several friends in Boston). That must really suck.
Happy, I hope you feel better soon!
Allison, LOL, it has been unseasonably WARM here with high's near 80!

Ward, Dagmar, and Sheila!
First, in non-dogsitter news, I swam a mile yesterday!

It took me a little less than an hour. I've never swam that far before.
Now, about the dog sitters. I think we are going to go with dog sitter #1 (the one our vet recommended). She was very professional, was nice to Carter (petted and scratched him when he came up to her, but didn't go chasing him around or anything) but had a very dog whisperer-esque attitude (calm and assertive), and showed up on time with a folder to give us containing her contracts, proof of insurance, card, etc. She answered all our questions and asked some about Carter. She didn't ask too much about him because this was an initial consultation, and she said that if we decide to hire her she will want to have another meeting where we go over Carter's habits and behavior in detail (she had some paperwork in the folder that showed all the types of things she asks about). The only things we were a little concerned about was that she said that when she is on a dog sit, her boyfriend watches her dog, and we were thinking, what if you break up with your boyfriend before our dog sit? Also, she mentioned that she has a prong collar for her dog, which I thought was a little weird. That and all the different clauses in the contract kind of freaked me out -- do I really want to think about what should be done if Carter dies while I'm gone? Or what should be done if *I* die while I'm gone? But on the other hand it makes sense to put that kind of thing in a contract, because you never know.
Dog sitter #2 (well, sitters) were nice enough as well and would probably also be okay. There were two women who came -- one is the owner of the company, the other is an employee/contractor who would be actually sitting the dog. They were both very friendly and affectionate to Carter. However, unlike sitter #1, they came in basically expecting us to sign a contract on the spot (although they were unfazed when I said we needed a few days to decide), and asked a million questions about Carter before I even got a chance to say, hey, I have questions for you too. She said she would mail me their proof of insurance. Their contract was not nearly as extensive or formal-looking as with sitter #1. All of that is pretty much okay though. DH was more concerned with the fact that the girl who would be sitting with Carter looked extremely young -- she mentioned she was married and had a child from a previous relationship, but I swear she looked like she was about 18 years old. She was also extremely chatty and kind of hyperactive seeming, and while she was nice enough DH thought (not sure if he thought this seriously or was joking, hard to tell with DH) it wasn't clear whether she is just that type of person or she might be on drugs. Also while it is kind of judgemental, DH thought that her being so young and already with a kid, ex-husband, and current husband, it might indicate that she had lacked judgement in the past.
Really I think either of them would be fine. The second sitters seemed a little more dog-enthusiastic, but I'm not sure that baby-talking to Carter means they'd necessarily do a better job. Carter seemed to like them all equally (he came up to get petted a few times, then went to sleep, as usual). DH was more comfortable with the first sitter because she was older and seemed less hyperactive. We still need to call her references, but if everything checks out there I think we will go with her. Being recommended by our vet is also a point in her favor.