Hey everyone,
I'm trying to find a program that will work for me and am struggling to weigh up the pros and cons objectively (no pun intended!) I've tried both the Paul McKenna and the calorie counting methods before and not succeeded with either, but after a bit of a wake up call recently I'm here to restart, but I'm not sure in which direction to go.
I'm currently 158lbs, wanting to reach 125lb by 2nd of February next year (plenty of time, I know). My exercise is 40 minute walks Monday to Friday, plus around 2 hours of cardio (split into 4 x 30 minute sessions with My Fitness Coach) across the week and 100 daily crunches. I'm also looking into getting some small dumbells to do a little free weight lifting to tone my arms. I also drink 50oz + of water each day.
So here's my thoughts on each plan.
I like the Paul McKenna ideals, though due to my lifestyle at the moment (squeezing in university, studying, work and keeping a household) I don't always have the time for each meal to sit and not do anything else like watch TV or read while I eat and put my cutlery down between each meal. I did see some results while I was on it, but very small (couple of ounces a week) which is difficult.
With calorie counting I struggled with hunger pangs, but I wasn't drinking as much water as I am now. Also, I find it difficult with some things to know how many calories I'm having, e.g. if I'm using a sauce for bolognaise and don't know whether I used closer to 2/5 of the jar, 1/3 or 1/2. I also have difficulties totalling up mixtures like homemade tuna mayo and things like that. I did use the daily plate while calorie counting, which helped, but still not sure how to overcome the mixture difficulties.
Any advice or suggestions would be most welcome - thanks for reading!
Katy


I was just wondering if you had a more direct method?