I agree, nelie, I've heard the Weston Price foundation has a bad reputation. Apparently they are known for misquoting peer reviewed studies to make it look like they back up their claims when they really don't, and for publishing skewed reports. That particular article was based on a lecture given by the coconut oil industry which might be a bit biased. They refer to resources from the 1920s through the 50s. I tend to lean towards more current research, published by sources that don't have tainted reputations.
Unfortunately, the internet encourages sites like that, which makes it difficult to tell the difference between what is accurate and what is quackery
