Welcome aboard!
I'm trying to stick to a much lower level of carbs than that myself, but it's not a competition!
I can certainly say that it's made a huge difference to my relationship with food, not just in terms of the weightloss but also in terms of how hungry I feel. Turns out that all the starchy starchy things I thought I enjoyed were actually more in the nature of self-fuelling addictions. Eating pasta or rice or bread or potatoes or what have you was, perversely, making me hungry, rather than sating my hunger.
Cutting down to 130g shouldn't be too tricky - although it depends on your metabolism. If you find it difficult, you might actually want to have a crack at cranking the carbs way down to 30 or so for a bit, just in case you find that easier. (Some people would find that harder, of course - but it depends on how your metabolism ticks. It may be easier just to go cold turkey. I'm not advocating that as your first choice, mind - I hope that you find 130g is a good level for you... but if you try it and find that you're still having cravings or hunger pangs at that level, it might be worth trying to restrict it further rather than washing your hands of it.)
I find low carb eating delicious, healthy, easy and enjoyable - and I've been finding it a very effective way of losing weight so far. I hope that you find this helps you succeed too.
You might be interested in reading Gary Taubes' book
Good Calories, Bad Calories, for an overview of the recent history of nutrition research, and the basis for the Low Fat approach as well as the basis for the Low Carb approach. I found that really made my head go boom, and it's the reason I decided to try Low Carb - and for me, it has really helped me to stay on plan, because I feel that I understand a lot more now about how my body works, and why low carb is a good strategy for me. But YMMV.