Quote:
Originally Posted by Glory87
Moderation doesn't work very well for me. I had to completely cut out fast food, soda and packaged baked goods. If I eat an Oreo (for example), I immediately want another Oreo and another. Something about those foods (and cold cereal out of the box) are very very triggering for me, I just want to keep eating them (it's weird, it's like I want to take an another bite when I'm still chewing, it's very...bingy).
I avoid most sugar, but I still split the occasional dessert in a restaurant or eat a small piece of nice dark chocolate (I don't worry about the sugar in fruit at all - fruit doesn't set off my triggers like muffins, scones, or candy).
Yup, same her. Moderation is a fantastic concept but in truth it doesn't work for everyone. If someone is sensitive to a particular ingredient or type of foods, consuming it in moderation is like giving a recovering alcoholic "just a taste" of wine.
I don't believe in fat free, because far is needed for health - fat-soluble vitamins will have no way to be absorbed and those are some VITAL vitamins: A, D, E, K, you cannot be healthy without.
I do believe in meat-free but not for weight loss; if you are e vegatarian out of conscience or if you have digestive trouble and you avoid certain kinds of meat or are doing a detox and are avoiding meat, that's understandable.
I do believe in sugar-free, because sugar doesn't have an nutritional value and it is in fact harmful to the body. However to me that means excluding processed sugar, not fruit. It may be hard to keep for some, but it's doable and IMO it's one of the best things one can do for himself - and for your children, sinc ADHD is actually connected to sugar consumption among other things.
That said, I think moderation is a good concept to strive for. But I think if we find we need to use stronger measures we should just accept that's what our body needs and do it, and others shoulnd't be too quick to judge us for that and peg our health regimen a fad diet, as it often happens.