Quote:
What if someone lives out in the country, and has slow dial up internet service? They know they are looking for a particular recipe, but they spend 10 minutes waiting for individual pages to load that are swamped with off topic chatter instead.
Ok, please know that I'm not trying to be argumentative ... mostly I'm just kind of enjoying the back and forth. What if someone lives out in the country, and has slow dial up internet service? They know they are looking for a particular recipe, but they spend 10 minutes waiting for individual pages to load that are swamped with off topic chatter instead.

But ... doesn't that argument hold true for ANY thread here on 3FC. If someone has a slow dialup connection, they're going to see that a thread has lots of responses and choose whether to click on it or not.
Aside from that, I just checked out the recipe threads in the LA Weight Loss area, the SB area, and the WW area (which has the most recipe posts). There were maybe 2 or 3 recipes in each section that had more than 2 or 3 responses. The most I saw was around 15 responses. OH and there was a very general thread in the WW forum for "Mexican Soups" - not a specific recipe - that had 50 responses.
I just don't see the "speed of access" thing being a big deal. Any thread on 3FC has the same potential issue - lots of responses that might slow down someone's connection.

Quote:
I am a very neat and organized person by nature, and if there were a recipe section here in CC, I wouldn't want it littered with off topic or one sentence posts.
But what if the other posters here *did* want that and didn't consider that "litter" or "a mess"? If someone posts "this was good" that encourages me to make the recipe. Why is a one line response necessarily clutter or litter?I am a very neat and organized person by nature, and if there were a recipe section here in CC, I wouldn't want it littered with off topic or one sentence posts.
.

