Poor Britney!
I've been soooo good in restraining myself from the Kirstie Alley thing, because that topic is a huge hot button for me!
FIRST of all, I am supportive of Kirstie regardless of her weight. I absolutely think she is fabulous at whatever weight she is at. I support her and her body type completely.
BUT, BUT, BUT -- where she crosses the line for he is claiming a certain amount of weight loss as a result of a commercial diet program, and makes these claims for money. The purpose of being a spokesperson is to sell a product. In this case, she is selling the JC product and is paid to advertise her weight loss as a result of use of this product. IF she claims she lost amount X, and in REALITY, lost amount Y, and amount Y is significantly less than amount X, THIS IS FALSE ADVERTISING!
That is my only issue with Kirstie Alley.
I don't believe that this is "celeb fat bashing". I DO think that truth in advertising and accountability for false advertising should be a standard that we hold in high regard. To me, her claims are NO DIFFERENT than those of *******' claims, which are quite harsly critiqued on the home page of this website.
In BOTH cases, undocumented tremendous amounts of weight have been claimed to be lost, the consumer is "lured" into a program based on the "success" of the product sold, and photographic evidence shows that the claims made are inaccurate!
There, now I feel better
