Quote:
with a few bad days of 2000 or so
So, how is 2000 "bad"? At 227, you're almost certainly burning more than that, unless you are elderly or extremely sedentary, and it doesn't sound like you're either.
What's "bad" about it if you need a day or two a week to eat like a normal person (general recommendations for a healthy young female are 2000 anyway)? You're bigger than normal--2000 should still be a "good" day.
I am slow, I admit, but I've lost about sixty pounds over the last 12 months, mostly a pound a week or lose-two-gain-one-lose-two, and I'm just now making myself strict on 2000 b/c I've plateaued in recent weeks (I weigh about 235ish--haven't stepped on the "official" scale in a few weeks). Even if you generally go much faster than pokey ol' me, 2000 every now and then is still GOOD.
I'm puzzled by your labeling it "bad" rather than "still pretty good"...