I don't want to give the idea that raw foodists eat only fruits and veggies, although there are frutarians, but that's a whole other realm (can you say "rapid tooth decay"?). I tend to focus on vegetables in particular because I am not a complete raw foodist and draw those nutrients from other sources as well.
A 100%, 365 days-a-year raw foodist typically does not eat just fruits and veggies (although it makes up the bulk of their diet). Fat sources should not be the bulk, but a compliment and there are plenty of places to get fats- the main ones being avocados and bananas and nuts (and their milk). This is PLENTY (especially if you have a great love of avocados like I do!). It's just a matter of comparing your daily needs in grams with the grams in your fat sources- not a hard thing to do.
The greatest concern of course, is reaching an adequate amount of calories for the day. Another issue is that raw foods tend to just run straight through some folks and they don't absorb all of the nutrients, which leads to a calorie diffeciency and causes some to be underweight. And then you can argue about how what is underweight in an overweight society and then you just lose everyone. I guess I'm trying to say that it's subjective and that people will believe what's right for them according to their knowledge. It's just simply another way of living.
Seriously, though, check out the site I mentioned earlier. I was curious about the effects of this lifestyle on real folks who are actually living it and what they eat from day to day (and not just a paper debate on right vs. wrong) and I got the answers I was looking for.

So I got stumped. If you aren't adverse to buying things like almond milk (and soy milk?) then it would make sense you could complete your proteins in that manner. 
