And of course feminists are all about choice, which is why there is no one universally agreed definition of feminism, and why I have a nice fat anthology on my shelves which is called
Feminisms. I would loosely define feminism as the belief that all genders should have equal rights, that this is not currently the case (although great progress has been made), and that this is a goal we should be working towards. Though I might change my definition later on this afternoon, it's not something I had a set definition for already sitting in my head. "Men are pigs" isn't feminism, by the way, it's misandry, and the popular notion that feminists all hate men is, in my view, mere misogyny. I've never met a feminist who hated men. I've met a few women who hated men, but I don't ever recall them defining themselves as feminists. They were usually accepting current gender conditions in rather a miserable way.
Bronzeager - I agree, it's probably because the blogosphere tends to be younger folks. I read the odd article on feminist websites, and I am trying to remember why I don't hang out there past that. Possibly because some of them are full of in-fighting (which I don't think is the fault of feminism, it just happens with a lot of politically-oriented websites), possibly because I really don't hang out on many websites. I do know that I rarely visit Lesbilicious because of all the bisexual-bashing, which I think is largely in comment threads but still lends a strong feeling to the site (and I think is the only time bisexuals exist on it anyway). I reckon that once a site, or even just a comment thread, gets taken over by the more vocal radicals, the moderates sit back and shut up and slide out of view.
When I was studying at uni, I had to take so many years out due to illness that I was a fair bit older than the other students by the end. I noticed a definite difference in how they approached feminism. Some of them were taking the current state of women's rights in the UK for granted to the point that they weren't aware of what has happened before, let alone what is really going on now and how much still needs to be done. Childless twenty year olds tend not to be thinking too much about how childrearing interacts with a career, too. They weren't defining themselves as feminists because they couldn't see the point of having feminism. Others were very enthusiastic but still very naive, and it showed up when we came to subjects such as sex work. Incidentally, I've learnt a few things about sex work and feminism as it's the speciality of a friend of mine, plus I've learned quite a lot about alternative sexualities and lifestyles and so forth by now, and the whole pole-dancing-for-fun thing seems like small potatoes in comparison! I'd call that one a "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it" issue for many people.
Another issue is probably that as far as I know, weight problems increase with age, generally. A group of women are less likely to have experience of weight gain when they're all 20 than when they're all 40, and hey, a lot of us saw things in black and white at that age. (Erm, not trying to scare off younger commenters here! We love you as well!) I don't think I remember anyone being significantly overweight in
any of my university classes. There's less of an obesity problem in the UK than in the US, granted, and I suspect that university students are subject to various social factors which make them less likely to be overweight. I do know that a friend of mine who teaches at a uni in America gets quite a lot of unpleasantness from her students (essays, remarks in class) because she's overweight.
Out of curiosity - first wave feminism? Wasn't that was the suffragettes? OK, I'm not actually trying to be a horrible nit-picker here, it's just that the image of women in full Edwardian dress, complete with bustles, striding along breaking shop windows and holding placards declaring that women have the right to choose what to do with their own bodies including losing weight if they want, was far too fabulous to pass up!
Jezebel - I haven't read that one, so I promptly trotted over and
look what I found. The infuriating thing is that I agree with so much of that article, but not its main agenda, which is to tell women to stop trying to lose weight. Apparently weight "shouldn't be your primary concern unless you're a baby, pregnant, recovering from major surgery, or told by a doctor that it needs to be," which is another way of saying "you shouldn't choose to lose weight, it's not feminist enough." (Also, sometimes doctors who harp on a patient's weight aren't actually being helpful.) Though I love the joke about
The Biggest Loser: BLOOD PRESSURE EDITION.
And are you recruitable as a writer or guest writer, my dear?