Quote:
I do have to agree that the primary problem is our addiction to sweet stuff in the first place. And, I'm not so sure that we can use price as an argument here - things labeled as "sugar free" are often three times as expensive as the same product sweetened with regular sugar - and often don't have all that many fewer calories - but we continue to buy them (except 3FC members who are much to savvy to believe the big print )
Not to mention that in the search for alternative fuels, corn now has other uses which could actually drive up the price of HFC, therefore the foods that contain it.
Things labeled "sugar free" are usually just filled with non-nutritive sweeteners instead of actual sweeteners like sugar or HFCS. They are more expensive to produce, therefore making the finished product more expensive to consumers.Originally Posted by yoyodieterinvegas
I think communicating directly is a good idea too but, the communication they understand the best is the one that goes directly to their bottom line. Just don't buy foods that contain ingredients we don't want to consume. My guess is these commercials were prompted because they've seen sales start to fall off. Unfortunately, I think it's because a lot of people have started looking for things sweetened with sucralose instead which, IMHO, is just another chemically overprocessed flavor enhancer - but it's made from 'real (chlorinated) sugar' instead of corn.I do have to agree that the primary problem is our addiction to sweet stuff in the first place. And, I'm not so sure that we can use price as an argument here - things labeled as "sugar free" are often three times as expensive as the same product sweetened with regular sugar - and often don't have all that many fewer calories - but we continue to buy them (except 3FC members who are much to savvy to believe the big print )
Not to mention that in the search for alternative fuels, corn now has other uses which could actually drive up the price of HFC, therefore the foods that contain it.
HFCS is a federally subsidized substance and therefore is the cheapest way to sweeten something.
I have to say that I've seen a trend towards being healthier in America...although I'm a cynic and believe that it is probably just another fad that will drop off eventually. How many fad diets have come and gone with everyone on them claiming that "they were going to be healthy for the first time!"....and when that diet failed to work, or they just fell off the wagon...they regained all the weight and went back to their old ways. I'm not saying that it is a trend to buy organic with everybody....but "organic" and "all natural" are such buzz words! A company just has to mention organic on their packaging and consumers will buy it like it is the last item on earth. There are a lot of ingredients that are not so healthy in "all natural" foods. I really wish the trend was to educate instead of just buying what the label flaunts. The marketing departments of these companies could care less about the health of the person buying the product...they just want to make sure that that person BUYS the product and will go to any means possible to do so.
I admit, I've been guilty of the same thing. My family started making moves to become an all natural and mainly organic household over a year ago. When I first started buying organic and all natural, I fell prey to the labels of "organic" bread which was actually just ww bread containing SOME organic bread flour. They flaunted that organic sign though and that bread flew off the shelves. I've become a bit more wise lately though and thoroughly check ingredient lists before I buy something new, because even organic and all natural items can contain something that I don't want my family to have. Just because it is labeled organic doesn't mean it is healthy - like ice cream....which is my DH's favorite ploy