Quote:
Originally Posted by treowth
I know a pound off is a pound in the right direction - but am envious of the people who lose 4lbs, 5lbs or more a week.
I used to be one of those people, so "this time" I not only was envying all those people, I was also envying my "old self," and I couldn't quite grasp that I no longer was a person who could lose 5 lbs a week.
The calorie level it now takes to maintain my weight, was a calorie level on which I would consistently lose 5 to 8 lbs per week (and not just for the first month or two. My previous week's weight loss record, both times a "first week" result was 11 lbs).
As I continued on the diet rollercoaster, each diet took more work and more calorie restriction to get similar results (and often I still wouldn't get similar results so I'd work harder to see slower, smaller results).
Unfortunately, you're stuck with the body you have, but the body you have today isn't necessarily the body you'll always have.
I'm finding that my weight loss ability is snowballing. I am currently able to lose weight more rapidly than when I started, and I'm hoping to be able to lose more rapidly in the future.
My current weight loss has disproven the theory that weight loss is always fastest during the first few months of a weight loss attempt. It may be the "usual" pattern, but it's not an inevitable one.
The more I do learn about what normal and average weight loss truly is, the more shocked I am at how small it is. All these years I quit diets because I felt like I was failing (and other people thought I was too - I was getting "consolations" instead of congratulations from the WW scale ladies for my "slow" weight loss).
If I had viewed it as good progress, I wouldn't have given up. Heck, if I knew what the real "average" weight loss looked like, I would have realized I was making good progress, and I wouldn't have given up.
Instead, we're taught to see success as failure, and I'm not sure why. I don't know why the "real" weight loss statistics are so often hidden, but we think that the "average" is 2 lbs per week, when it is much, much smaller.
Now some people do (at least occasionally) lose 5 lbs a week, but if the "real" average is really half a pound or less (as I've observed in TOPS) that means that there are 9 people losing nothing.
Even in my TOPS group there are folks who lose 5 lbs a week, but I had always assumed (but I was wrong) that because almost every week someone lost between 3 to 5 lbs, that these people were losing 3 to 5 lbs every week.
Instead, I learned that the big losses were rarely acheived by the same person even two weeks in a row.
We have a contest every month in which the people who did not have a gain during the month, split a $10 prize. Usually only 2 or at most 3 people (out of almost 30) earn that honor. And some months it's only one person - or none (and then the prize the next month is $20).
So out of 30 people, fewer than 10% have a no-gain month.
I've never yet experienced even one no-gain month (I'm pretty sure that if I only drank water and ate no food, I would still gain 5 to 8 lbs during TOM).
I'm really grateful for TOPS, because it's let me see that even what seems like super-slow weight loss is still extraordinary. It's just a shame I didn't see it when I was averaging losses of 2 to 6 lbs per week.
It's kind of crazy that I've been able to lose more than 70 lbs at the rate of 1 - 2 lbs a month, when I couldn't ever do that at 2-6 lbs per week.