Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2013, 11:53 PM   #16  
Senior Member
 
TracyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 181

S/C/G: 212/194/160

Height: 5'6"

Default

Yeah, they have all of that stuff. It basically involves adding a serving of this or that a week until you are maintaining but not losing anymore or gaining. Then I think maintenance is just staying at that point.

I don't think it will be a problem for me. I could probably add a lettuce leaf and gain weight! O.K., I know it's not that bad to be in your 50s, but weight loss is not as easy as you get older.
TracyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 08:37 AM   #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
barri1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 188/175/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee2 View Post
@Barri; the plan I got with my costco order has 2 slices of bread as a starch but it says "light" bread and says 40-50 cals a slice.
That is the new numbered plans. The old colored plans only 1 slice of bread is a starch
barri1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 08:40 AM   #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
barri1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 188/175/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee2 View Post
ladies, here is my plan: 3 protein (4 oz) 2 veg 2 fruit 2 starch 1 dairy 1 fat 3 extras and the 2 bars So it looks like the gold plan, I think?
Its comperable to the gold plan in calories...the food is broken up differently for the gold plan.
barri1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 08:40 AM   #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
barri1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 188/175/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

So lets take a census...who likes the new numbered plans better and who likes the old colored plans better?
barri1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:41 AM   #20  
Senior Member
 
TracyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 181

S/C/G: 212/194/160

Height: 5'6"

Default

Hi Barri, we're all checking in early today!

I have never seen the new numbered plans, but will check them out when I get mine in the mail. I think I might like the small amount of extra starch, and it seems to be that you get three smaller portions of protein a day, instead of two larger ones, if I've followed what I've seen correctly. If I can lose weight and feel more satisfied, it might be good for me. If not, I'll stay on the purple plan.
TracyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:17 AM   #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
barri1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 188/175/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TracyC View Post
Hi Barri, we're all checking in early today!

I have never seen the new numbered plans, but will check them out when I get mine in the mail. I think I might like the small amount of extra starch, and it seems to be that you get three smaller portions of protein a day, instead of two larger ones, if I've followed what I've seen correctly. If I can lose weight and feel more satisfied, it might be good for me. If not, I'll stay on the purple plan.
I am kind of torn on what plan to use. I lost all my weight 7 years ago on the blue/gold/green plans. I have the new colored plans but I am not sure about the starch thing too...is it too much starch??? Yes you can have a whole sandwich on the numbered plans but that goes against EVERYTHING I learned on the colored plans...LOL...I feel like throwing my hands up and saying...WELL WHICH IS IT???...LOL
barri1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:56 AM   #22  
Senior Member
 
TracyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 181

S/C/G: 212/194/160

Height: 5'6"

Default

I am willing to have slower weight loss if it means I'm satisfied and won't be tempted to cheat. I think I'll try out the new plan when I receive it, and change back to the colored plan if I'm not losing anything.

My biggest problem right now is getting in all of my water. With the chilly weather, that is hard to do.
TracyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 12:34 AM   #23  
Dee2
 
Dee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 196/186/145 (JC 5-11)

Height: 5'4

Default

I've noticed some discrepancies even among the materials I've rec'd in the same pkg. for instance; in the kick off pamphlet that was enclosed it does not mention using lites at all for the 2 days and it says unlimited protein. In the diary, it says 2 lites and a spot to record what time they were eaten. And it specifies 6oz protein for the day. I went with the pamphlet. No lites and unlimited protein. Think I lost a few lbs. day 1 tomorrow!! (Or is this day 3??) hope you all are doing well.
Dee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:04 AM   #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
barri1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 188/175/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee2 View Post
I've noticed some discrepancies even among the materials I've rec'd in the same pkg. for instance; in the kick off pamphlet that was enclosed it does not mention using lites at all for the 2 days and it says unlimited protein. In the diary, it says 2 lites and a spot to record what time they were eaten. And it specifies 6oz protein for the day. I went with the pamphlet. No lites and unlimited protein. Think I lost a few lbs. day 1 tomorrow!! (Or is this day 3??) hope you all are doing well.
The first 2 days when you drink the juice it is NO LITES and unlimited protein. Then starting on day 3 you follow the diary with serving sizes and LITES.
barri1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:12 AM   #25  
Dee2
 
Dee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 196/186/145 (JC 5-11)

Height: 5'4

Default

I didn't do the lites. The booklet looked more recent so I followed that. I'm happy to report I lost 4.6 lbs. I know it's water but after struggling to just maintain on WW I'm happy to see that number at least heading in the right direction! I'm off and running today (figuratively speaking LOL) my start weight for LAWL was 188.6 down to 184 Thanks for the support ladies!
Dee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:22 AM   #26  
Dee2
 
Dee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 196/186/145 (JC 5-11)

Height: 5'4

Default

Ladies, in the diary, it has the Take Off included in the plan. There is a spot for it every 2 weeks. Do you take the lites and 6 oz protein when you are doing it every 2 weeks?

Last edited by Dee2; 01-26-2013 at 09:22 AM.
Dee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:56 AM   #27  
Senior Member
 
TracyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 181

S/C/G: 212/194/160

Height: 5'6"

Default

Technically, you should. However, back when I went to the centers from 2005-2007, I was told to use the Fast Forward, now known as Kick Off, because I needed more protein to be able to work out and not be tired. I was a real gym rat back in those days. So if I needed a boost or was participating in one of their numerous contests, I would do Fast Forward instead of the Take Off plan. I think if you were going to settle in for a quiet weekend, the regular Take-Off with lites would be fine.

Good for you for finishing up the Kick Off!

By the way, Dee, since you have the latest program info, could you confirm that if I weigh 211 pounds, I should be on plan 3? I ordered the food guide and program from a seller, but the woman forgot to put in the program book and I just got the food guide. The program book will be here early next week. I thought I read on the boards once that I should be on plan 3, but I wanted to confirm that.

I do like the three smaller portions of protein. They are big enough to satisfy, but not enough to make you feel stuffed like a half pound of chicken used to make me feel.
TracyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 12:08 PM   #28  
Dee2
 
Dee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 196/186/145 (JC 5-11)

Height: 5'4

Default

@ Barri. Yes that is correct. Plan 3
Dee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 12:32 PM   #29  
Senior Member
 
TracyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 181

S/C/G: 212/194/160

Height: 5'6"

Default

Thanks, Dee.
TracyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 01:41 PM   #30  
Dee2
 
Dee2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 113

S/C/G: 196/186/145 (JC 5-11)

Height: 5'4

Default

Sorry Tracy! Not sure how I mixed you two up. Old age, I guess LOL.
Dee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2010 Weight loss challenge :-) matt_H 100 lb. Club 301 01-04-2011 08:06 PM
October Weight Loss Challenge FullSteamAhead Chicks up for a Challenge 563 11-03-2009 12:51 PM
September Weight Loss Challenge FullSteamAhead Chicks up for a Challenge 713 10-03-2009 10:55 PM
June Weight Loss Challenge Continued FullSteamAhead Chicks up for a Challenge 627 07-01-2009 12:33 PM
June Weight Loss Challenge FullSteamAhead Chicks up for a Challenge 498 06-09-2009 09:02 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.