General Diet Plans and Questions General diet questions, support for various diet plans other than those listed below.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2013, 04:50 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
skittlesfirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 598

S/C/G: SW:171 CW:see ticker GW 120

Height: 5'1

Default Do you eat GMO

I've been trying to find a healthy cereal but everyone keeps complaining about Cheerios and other top brands having gmos.ive done a tiny bIt of research there bad. But honestly they seem to be in everything and it seems like more of a pita to avoid them then to eat them.

Do you eat gmo foods why or why not!

I just want to point out I don't blindly trust the FDA a lot of what they deem safe is banned in loads of other countries.

Last edited by skittlesfirehawk; 10-17-2013 at 05:31 PM.
skittlesfirehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 05:19 PM   #2  
Here to Learn
 
EagleRiverDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,099

S/C/G: 225/140/135

Height: 5'5"

Default

I find it difficult not to. For one, labeling is not yet mandatory for GMO's. It should be, as not all conventionally grown foods are GMO but really the only way to guarantee you're not eating GMO right now is to choose things labeled organic.

I don't trust the FDA at all. They're totally in bed with Monsanto.
EagleRiverDee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 05:42 PM   #3  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

I think there are two issues that are tied together unfortunately.

1) Is Monsanto evil?
2) Are GMO foods bad for you?

Now usually people who view Monsanto as evil (and damn if they don't have some evil practices) lump GMOs as being bad for you.

Here is an interesting article about one of the leaders in the anti-GMO food movement.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_te...was_wrong.html

Do I eat GMOs? Most likely. I eat a lots of organic food (and GMO foods can't be labeled organic) but not everything. I don't eat a lot of packaged foods. I generally choose items that say non-GMO if they aren't organic.

Do I think GMOs are dangerous? I think the verdict is still out on that as studies are ongoing. I am not entirely anti-GMO, I am what I would call GMO cautious.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:55 PM   #4  
beautiful bright soul :)
 
belovedspirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Earth ♡
Posts: 669

S/C/G: 296 / 171 / 150

Default

I haven't had the money to eat organic foods in several years, to be honest, so I do eat GMO foods. However, I still try to be mindful to eat non-processed and whole foods, and to avoid certain ingredients like HFCS and artificial flavourings/additives. I figure this means I do the best I can, and still take care of my health in ways not specific to the GMO issue since that's something I have the means to attend to at this time.
belovedspirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2013, 10:16 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
Palestrina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,607

S/C/G: 215/188/150

Height: 5'4"

Default

I do the best I can. It's not always possible to avoid it but as long as I eat natural foods I try not to worry too much. I never use canola or vegetable oils, and just stick with olive or Safflower oil. I avoid certain brands and do my best to buy seasonal organic and/or local produce. I am familiar with certain brands but it's hard to know all of them by heart. There are online guides and lists that you can find and carry with you to the grocery store to double check the items you want to buy.
Palestrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2013, 12:04 PM   #6  
diamondgeog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Default

As I understand it if you eat wheat, organic or not, but just any kind of wheat you are eating GMO. Norman Bulllog (spelling) architect of the 'green revolution' developed higher yield dwarf wheat that did not exist in Nature.

I think the U.S. is planted in this now along with most of the rest of the world. And no, no one knows the ultimate health effects of this wheat. That was not taken into account during its development.

Of course things happening in same time is not causation. But many many diseases have skyrocketed since this wheat came into being and obesity has soared. Other people will say it helped stave off mass hunger. So you would have to go completely wheat free to avoid GMOs.

Last edited by diamondgeog; 10-28-2013 at 01:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2013, 01:15 PM   #7  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Actually, it appears the opposite is true? There is no GMO wheat in the US?

http://www.kingarthurflour.com/flours/gmo-wheat.html
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2013, 01:40 PM   #8  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondgeog View Post
As I understand it if you eat wheat, organic or not, but just any kind of wheat you are eating GMO. Norman Bulllog (spelling) architect of the 'green revolution' developed higher yield dwarf wheat that did not exist in Nature.

I think the U.S. is planted in this now along with most of the rest of the world. And no, no one knows the ultimate health effects of this wheat. That was not taken into account during its development.

Of course things happening in same time is not causation. But many many diseases have skyrocketed since this wheat came into being and obesity has soared. Other people will say it helped stave off mass hunger. So you would have to go completely wheat free to avoid GMOs.
I am unsure Bourlag's wheat is planted in the US but I looked it up:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/bl...-av-2009-09-14

Bourlag, as far as I can tell, did not use genetic modification for his production of wheat. He used a technique used for thousands of years by farmers in which you cross two similar plants to create a plant with the best properties of both. This has also done with animal farming. I would say 90% or more of the foods we eat today didn't exist naturally until intervention by farmers. If you look into grafting, you can find more details about it. With animal farming, it involved breeding different types of animals together. That is why they say the cattle we have today are much fatter than the cattle that existed thousands of years ago, due to breeding. It is also why our carrots are sweeter and other vegetables/fruits are bred to be sweeter. There is a noticeable difference between wild blueberry plans and farmed blueberry plants. Same is true for other plants found in the wild vs farmed plants. I know a lot of people love Honeycrisp apples but honey crisp apples are also a form of crossing different types of apple plants to get a sweeter, crunchy apple.

I believe Bourlag was trying to avoid what happened with the potato famine by crossing strains of wheat to make something more resistant. And I will say this technique can happen naturally but it is very rare.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2013, 02:34 PM   #9  
diamondgeog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Default

Those are excellent points. In his time the techniques available now did not exist. And it is true farmers and livestock farmers have been doing artificial selection for millennium. Heck even pet owners.

So I suppose green revolution wheat isn't 'GMO' in how we are using it in the present. But it is also not the wheat of a 100 years ago. And he wasn't necessarily looking at the effects on nutrition in all its possible ramifications. How could he? I think what we now term GMO food is pretty darn scary from the huge unknown perspective. I definitely want labeling in the U.S.

I will also say something to keep in mind for nutrition is that our soils are so much poorer. And you can't just look at the produce itself but the fertilizers being used. Tomatoes are a sad example. They might look similar to 100 years ago. But when measured in labs they are sad nutrition wise to a 100 years ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2013, 03:17 PM   #10  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Actually tomatoes also are no where near where they were 100 years ago, again they were bred for durability and sweetness. And the tomatoes we eat today don't look anything like the tomatoes that were available pre-farming.

My husband and I were talking this weekend about agricultural diversity, to which we have none. If you eat an apple, you basically get a choice of a couple but there are tons of varieties of apples. I remember going cherry picking with my parents and farms would have something like 20 varieties of cherries but we get 1-2 versions in the store.

Our soil also has issues with lack of nutrients and sometimes contamination. So yes, farming even without GMO has changed.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concerns about IP ingredients (GMO or non? organic? sucralose, soy): Anyone else? Tailwinds Ideal Protein Diet 67 04-07-2013 08:43 PM
Do you want to yell, don't eat FF stuff with HFCS? sharonrr Whole Foods Lifestyle 28 02-18-2007 07:02 PM
Splenda help, and what do you do with your starches! aggie2006 LA Weight Loss 38 04-12-2006 09:11 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.