General chatter Because life isn't just about dieting. Play games, jokes, or share what's new in your life!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2014, 09:49 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GlamourGirl827's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,862

Default Females over 140 lbs are big enough for their own awards?? What?

Ok so now that I'm back into running, I've been searching our local races...anyway I came across a duathlon in Sept for autism, and for anyone that doesnt already know, my oldest son is autistic, so I was thinking of doing it. (Its not too bad, I could be ready by then)

And I'm looking at the age groupings for award, you know like every decade (20-29, 30-39 etc) and they have a seperate males over 200 lbs award group...ok...and an "athenas female" award group 140 lbs and over...

Really?! I just didn't think when I was 145 lbs before this baby that was was still that kind of big...I doubt I'll be below 140 by Sept...I'm not looking to win an award, gees, I just want to finish and do it for a cause that it close to me. But this kind of made me feel sad. Is this a normal weight cut off with race award groups?
GlamourGirl827 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 09:59 PM   #2  
Lifelong Alaskan!
 
alaskanlaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Posts: 2,669

S/C/G: 230/180/150

Height: 5'5"

Default

I've only seen age categories in races here....I've never heard of awards based on weight....that seems odd
alaskanlaughter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 10:10 PM   #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GlamourGirl827's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,862

Default

yeah, I'm kind of taking it as "those" people are so fat/heavy that they can't even compare to "normal" weight people...seems weird to me...and I'm one of those people! lol

Last edited by GlamourGirl827; 02-08-2014 at 10:10 PM.
GlamourGirl827 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2014, 11:14 PM   #4  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

Athenas are common in triathlons. When I was interested in doing a triathlon (before I rediscovered my fear of a 2 wheel bike), I read on various forums and there were a lot of Athena athletes, there is also a corresponding male version but I forget the name.
nelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 07:41 AM   #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GlamourGirl827's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,862

Default

It was clydesdale. I was just surprised that the weight cut off was 140! I dont think of it as that big that it needs a class of its own.
GlamourGirl827 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 09:47 AM   #6  
Slow and Steady
 
LovesToTravel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 389

S/C/G: 169/169/145

Height: 5'3"

Default

Huh, that's strange. In the local 5k races here the Athena category is for 150 lbs and up (and the corresponding Clydesdale category for men is +200 lbs). Maybe it depends who's organizing the race or what kind of race it is?

I can't imagine some of the taller athletic ladies being thrilled with the Athena cut off at 140 lbs though, yeesh.
LovesToTravel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2014, 10:30 PM   #7  
Senior Member
 
JoyfulVegGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 496

Height: 5'5"

Default

I would actually be excited about that, it would give me a better chance to place (yeah, right).

I think this is pretty typical of most races, though. I know all of the races I've done have had a cutoff around 150. The thing is, you have to CHOOSE to be added to the category, and it's independent of height. That's because added weight typically adds a bit to your time, and this helps even the playing field for those runners who have more mass (muscle or otherwise).

So I wouldn't take it personally, it's more for competitive runners than anything. Kind of like weight classes in boxing.

Last edited by JoyfulVegGirl; 02-09-2014 at 10:34 PM. Reason: IPad errors
JoyfulVegGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2014, 11:28 AM   #8  
Staying the Same
 
krampus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 6,448

S/C/G: 160+/116-120/maintainer

Height: 5'5

Default

140 seems like a weird cutoff unless there's a caveat "must be shorter than ..." - if you're 6 feet tall and 140 that's the same as being 5'6 and 110!
krampus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2014, 01:37 PM   #9  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 40

S/C/G: 137/134/~120

Height: 5' 5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krampus View Post
140 seems like a weird cutoff unless there's a caveat "must be shorter than ..." - if you're 6 feet tall and 140 that's the same as being 5'6 and 110!
I agree that it's a weird cut off. I have a 6 foot, 1 inch friend who is very, very fit and can run like nobody's business. I'm sure she weighs 140 or more, and she's quite thin.
LongColdWinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 02:03 PM   #10  
Senior Member
 
Bellamack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,821

S/C/G: 214/211/150

Height: 5'5"

Default

Well then I would have blown them out of the water when I used to run. I always weighed 135-140 lbs and could run 5 miles doing 6 minute miles. I also was a very good competitve swimmer, so they can stuff their weight catagories. It should be only age.

Last edited by Bellamack; 03-15-2014 at 02:03 PM.
Bellamack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.