Calories in Pork Neck Bones? I'm stumped! - 3 Fat Chicks on a Diet Weight Loss Community

Food Talk And Fabulous Finds Recipes, Healthy Cooking, and General Food Topics

Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2010, 03:43 PM   #1  
looking for onederland
Thread Starter
ars's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 334

S/C/G: 300/ticker/165

Height: 5'9"

Default Calories in Pork Neck Bones? I'm stumped!

I am making kapusta today, which is lots of sauerkraut simmered for at least 8 hours with mushrooms and raw pork necks and just the tiniest bit of sugar to cut the acidity.

I use the pork necks with the bone in, and I bought 3 pounds of them. I cannot figure out how many calories these are! They will cook with the sauerkraut until the meat falls off the bone, so no fat will be drained off (it's what gives the kapusta flavor).

I've found a couple of sites online that list this:
1 oz, with bone (yield after cooking, bone removed) = 17 calories
1 oz, with bone cooked (yield after cooking, bone removed) = 23 calories
Maybe I'm overtired, but if they are both "1 oz...yield after cooking", shouldn't they be the same? And even so, only 816 - 1104 calories for 3 pounds seems low considering the neck is so fatty.

Does anyone have any ideas? Or does that range sound right to you? This is a dish traditional for my family, and I make it several times a year. I'd like to make sure I'm not horribly underestimating my calorie count when I eat it (since I'll probably have a bowl daily for my lunch or dinner meal until it's gone)!

Last edited by ars; 02-13-2010 at 03:44 PM.
ars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 04:37 PM   #2  
Senior Member
kaplods's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,383

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"


Most of the weight of neckbones is inedible. You're paying mostly for bone (which is why they should be cheap, but aren't always). A pound of neckbones probably only yields about 3 to 4 ounces of meat, so 17 to 23 calories per ounce sounds very reasonable.

If you weighed the meat after cooking, the calories would be much higher per ounce because the weight of the bone wouldn't be figured in.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.