Featherweights For those with just a few pounds, or trying to lose those last few pounds.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2011, 08:23 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fitmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 986

Height: 5'6

Default What's your waist to hip ratio?

I was curious to see what other featherweights waist to hip ratio was. Mine's 0.79. I read anything above 0.80 is in the danger zone.
fitmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 09:30 PM   #2  
getting back to healthy
 
Cookiebear23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 40

S/C/G: 167/ticker/120

Height: 5'3"

Default

Mine is 0.76. I'd consider myself to be slightly pear-shaped.
Cookiebear23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 04:10 AM   #3  
say what?
 
philana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,069

Height: 5'6"

Default

Mine is 0.85 - but I'm not sure I have the right measurements. Either way - good to pay attention to it! I am however pear shaped, so my belly will be gone in no time.
philana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 05:20 AM   #4  
nearly there
 
Magrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,052

S/C/G: 145/111/95

Height: 5"1"

Default

0.69 here.
Magrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 05:56 AM   #5  
Senior Member
 
claire0412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 369

Height: 5'8

Default

Mine is 0.71, which apparently is healthy. Fitmom, I wouldn't worry too much. I think it is only if you carry a significant amount of fat around your waist (and between your internal organs). You seem to be so tiny that I doubt you have enough fat to worry about.
claire0412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 07:12 AM   #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fitmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 986

Height: 5'6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by claire0412 View Post
Mine is 0.71, which apparently is healthy. Fitmom, I wouldn't worry too much. I think it is only if you carry a significant amount of fat around your waist (and between your internal organs). You seem to be so tiny that I doubt you have enough fat to worry about.
That's the whole problem with being a ruler. Your waist is almost non-existent, lol. I'd love to get my waist down to at least 25". I think 24" is out of reach b/c my body genetically will just not cinch inward - no matter what I do. Think of Gwyneth Paltrow's figure in a two-piece bathing suit with her boyish waist and that's basically me - though she's obviously a bit leaner/toned than me due to her weight hovering around 100 lbs. compared to my 117 lbs. which does make a significant difference.

Mine was 0.82 a few months ago before I started running and my waist was 27" then so losing an inch from my waist recently I guess did help. So that's progress, right?

Am I the only ruler here? All you gals are mostly pears which makes me so envious, lol. BTW, I heard that most men prefer pears as a women's body shape. Just a little trivia to start your morning off, lol.

Last edited by fitmom; 07-12-2011 at 07:14 AM.
fitmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 09:10 AM   #7  
Senior Member
 
Dianne042425's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 793

S/C/G: 138/135/119

Height: 5'5

Default

Eeeek mine is .66. I dont know anything about wait/hip ratios. I just googled a calculator lol What does it mean if you're really high or really low??
Dianne042425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 10:13 AM   #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fitmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 986

Height: 5'6

Default

I would think lower is better than higher. But I'm not a doctor.
fitmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:27 AM   #9  
Senior Member
 
mayness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central NY
Posts: 1,309

S/C/G: 160/160/115

Height: 5'2"

Default

Last time I measured, mine was .85. But I think mine is more from a lack of hips than an excess of visceral fat. Maybe I'm wrong, I guess I'll see what happens to it as I lose weight.
mayness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:44 AM   #10  
Junior Member
 
jens10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24

S/C/G: 123/123/113

Height: 5'3"

Default

Mine is .65, but I just read an article which said that waist-hip ratio is not an accurate indicator of health. This new study took into account overall body fat percentage (which, oddly enough, previous studies had not done) and found that waist to hip ratio tended to become higher as body fat percentage increased, and a high body fat percentage is what put people at a higher risk for cardiovascular issues- not WHR.

Obviously, there are thin/average weight people with athletic figures and high WHRs, but they are not at any increased risk.
jens10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:52 AM   #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fitmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 986

Height: 5'6

Default

I tend to disagree with the studies that you previously cited b/c my body fat is 18.2% which is considered on the higher end of the athletic range and my waist to hip ratio is just sneaking under the acceptable range. I think it has to do a lot with what shape your body is IMO. If I was more of an hourglass, I'd probably have a lower number overall. But who knows? They are always changing things in these studies, lol.
fitmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 11:53 AM   #12  
Senior Member
 
mimi86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 186

S/C/G: 130/120/115

Height: 5'2"

Default

Mine's .72...which sounds great and all except a 38.5" hips isn't all that spectacular on someone my height! I'm an hourglass when I'm skinny but a pear when I'm carrying a lil' extra!

Last edited by mimi86; 08-15-2011 at 01:47 PM.
mimi86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 12:06 PM   #13  
Junior Member
 
jens10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24

S/C/G: 123/123/113

Height: 5'3"

Default My previous post was wordy and confusing

Sorry, I just reread my previous post- and I did not make my point clearly.

The most recent study says that waist to hip ratio does not matter, overall body fat percentage is what matters.

Sorry, fitmom- You sound perfectly healthy and I was attempting to reassure you.
jens10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 12:18 PM   #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fitmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 986

Height: 5'6

Default

Thanks okay, jens10. I do worry a bit because heart disease runs in my family but I am old enough to realize that these studies are just a starting point and there are exceptions to every rule. I think I fall under the exceptions rule in this case, lol. My bust and hips are not gonna get any bigger at this point (both are 33") so my only hope is too whittle my waist down a bit more and see what happens. No harm done.
fitmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 06:09 PM   #15  
Member
 
Jubilee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 41

S/C/G: 148/122/119

Height: 5'7.5"

Default

How do you compute it? Is it your hips around the hip bone or around the butt/saddlebag area? Thanks.
Jubilee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Do you Measure Your Waist? Stopfat Weight Loss Support 35 07-10-2011 08:49 AM
What's your favorite body part? althepirate 100 lb. Club 31 04-15-2009 03:14 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.