that 3FC is at best 'skeptical' about diet pills - particularly the countless OTC ones out there.
What is it about them anyway? The endless marketing hype? The fact that they are UNREGULATED and you are taking a huge crap shoot in relying on the 'nutrition information' on the side of the bottle being correct? Look...the companies (mostly fly-by-nighters) who peddle these products don't give a crap, for the most part, about how accurate their labeling is. It's not like buying Sudafed, Advil or any OTC medicine out there - because the companies that put those products out are
REGULATED by the Government and spend a lot of $$$ in research and quality control. The companies who put out those diet pills AREN'T.
Check out
this sticky thread about ConsumerLab's test on some of those products - I'm sure that's just the tip of the iceberg - mislabeling, 'surprise' ingredients such as lead - you really want to take that chance? Basically the 'active ingredients' in these pills are some form of caffiene or other 'speedy' type of thing, mixed with some cheapass vitamins and (often) a bunch of laxatives/diuretics, but they're lauded (by the marketers) as "all natural".
It's just like all those Hoodia pills that have flooded the market. Even if the pills HAVE ANY hoodia in them...which I doubt...first off, there are a LOT of types of hoodia plants out there (Hoodia definition: the milkweed family of the flowering-plant order Gentianales, including more than
280 genera and about
2,000 species of tropical herbs or shrubby climbers, rarely shrubs or trees) so my guess is that a lot of these marketers might be just taking any kind of hoodia plant, grinding it up and sticking it in these pills - personally I suspect they don't even bother to do that, just put the name "hoodia" on it. Anyways, we have an entire sticky on the topic if you want to check it out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobetheman
. I don't want to hear too much about the FDA's great research, but i will hear what they say. why? Because they have obviously been bought and in some cases where they have not been bought they are ignorant. I have read of documented instances where the FDA has kept testing information suppressed for various reasons, more than once over the years. I have seen the FDA allow some companies to manipulate them directly and indirectly, money or other involved in these instances...
In case you weren't aware of this, because of the 1994 Supplement Act, the FDA's hands are TIED for the most part. You can read about this here -
How the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 Weakened the FDA
Quote:
Most people think that dietary supplements and herbs are closely regulated to ensure that they are safe, effective, and truthfully advertised. Nothing could be further from the truth. Although some aspects of marketing are regulated, the United States Congress has concluded that "informed" consumers need little government protection. This conclusion was embodied in the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 -- commonly referred to as "DSHEA" -- which severely limits the FDA's ability to regulate these products.
The FDA ain't perfect - but I'd rather trust THEM than a bunch of shysters.
As far as 'doing research' - unless you have a testing lab at your disposal, all one can do is rely on the labeling of these products. And as stated above, one can't even rely on that! Kind of scary if you think about it. Comparing these unregulated 'supplements' with what you get at a licensed pharmacy or the regulated OTC medications is comparing apples and oranges.
IMO, the diet pill/supplement industry is a throwback to the 'patent medicines' of the 1800s/early 1900s - that snakeoil that was said to cure all ills but turned out to be God knows what...usually a bunch of crap mixed with cheap wine or whiskey.
There is, however, one prescription diet pill that is under study right now, the results look promising - we have a sticky here in DIW on
Acomplia - and Reuters has a story on this out today actually:
Drug firms eye fat profits from new obesity pills
IMO if this is the 'real deal' or at least something that works in conjunction with diet and exercise - one of the BEST things about Acomplia in my mind is that it will hopefully make most of these overmarketed, overhyped, underregulated diet nostrums GO AWAY - kind of like when Minoxidil came out - before there were COUNTLESS 'miracle hair restore' products being peddled in magazines, TV etc - after Minoxidil was released (and especially after it went to OTC status) the ads seemed to vanish for the most part

so I'm hoping the same happens if this stuff actually works. However I think the caveat in the article is also true:
Quote:
Given the scale of the problem, the arrival of new weight-loss drugs will be greeted with some excitement -- but they may also pose a dilemma.
Dr Timothy Armstrong of the WHO's department of chronic diseases believes medication can help only a very small minority of patients and will not impact the overall obesity epidemic.
"It's not a panacea," he said. "Drugs don't have a role in preventing obesity in the wider population, where interventions around physical activity and diet are far more cost-effective."
Professor Luc Van Gaal of Belgium's University Hospital Antwerp, the lead investigator for one of the main clinical studies for Acomplia, sees things rather differently.
He argues doctors must accept that dieting and exercise alone often produce disappointing results, leaving patients at risk of falling seriously ill.
"Drug therapy is not the answer for every obese person in the street, but for certain patients who are running a risk, pharmacological therapy can help," he said.