![]() |
I need some expertise on cal counting here!!
I had a Question for ya. I am doing pretty well and know all about healthy eating and all that. I have plenty of motivation/will power etc. I am not struggling with still wanting "bad foods" too often. My problem right now is what amount of cals to choose. I was losing on an average of 1700 daily with about 30% fat about 1.5 pounds a week last month. I walked an average of 87 minutes a day. Briskly. I lost 6 pounds. The month before I was even worse with my "bad days" eating and only walked an average of 67 minutes a day BUT I lost 9.5 pounds that month! So basically I had more bad days and walked alot less yet lost more. :dizzy:
This is my dilemma, I am not interested in taking weight off too quickly. But 2 pounds a week to 2.5 is safe IMO. (Like I lost in Oct.)I would rather lose 2-2.5 than just 1.5 though. So this month I switched it back a bit. I decided that a 60 minute average a day is fine. But the problem is sometimes I am completely satisfied on 1200 cals a day! Especially the days I do beans and brown rice. I make sure to get plenty of fruit, dairy and vegis in as well. I am at 208 now though and I hear so much conflicting info like if I cut too low now, what if I pleateau and can not go any lower and have no where to lower my cals etc. (I understand that and agree with that) Then I hear, listen to your body etc. And I do. Sometimes I am just not as hungry as other times. It is like if I am at 1200 cals or 1300 and I am NOT hungry then why should I try to force myself to eat more? I do have some days where I am just hungrier than others. If I am hungry, I eat. I usually have one out to eat day a week which is always a higher cal day so that helps to balance stuff out. Like last week was Katy's b~day on tuesday so we had cake and pizza and crazy bread etc. I planned for it. But the next few days I made sure to keep the cals low and at the end of the week my average was like 1550 a day. That is not bad, IMO. I lost two pounds last week. So this week I am wondering if maybe I should do the same? I kept my cals relatively low for a few days and (my week starts on sunday) by thursday I was already down 2 pounds! Now I have no problem with going ahead and having a few more low cal days this week and hitting 3. Believe me I could probably do that indefinately! At least most of the time, cause most of the time the food I am eating is so filling that is plenty for me. But I am worried about plateauing. So I figured I am going to have a few higher days for a few days so I can get to a higher average for the week. I will maintain the 208 then sunday I can start all over again. :dizzy: Sun - wed were low cal days for me the average would of been Sunday 1349 Monday 1408 Tuesday 1177 Wed. 1240 (=5174 div. by 4 = 1293.5) Thurs. 1634(6808/1361) Fri 1984 possibly(8792/1465) Sat 1738 possibly I was fine all 4 of those days and was not hungry. I was satisfied. Yesterday came along and I did indulge in coffee and creamer which does eat up extra cals and I told myself that I needed to have some higher cal days toward the end of the week to get to at least 1550 average for the week. The good thing was yesterday I was more hungry. I finished dinner and was actually still hungry(would of ended at 1550 that day) I was still hungry so I told myself, go ahead and eat more. So i went ahead and had .50 a cup of brown rice. So I ended up at 1634 for the day. Which bring me back to the scenario about listening to my body. If I am not hungry and know I have been eating regularily and healthy stuff etc then that is it, stop. If I am still needing more then to do it. Now today, I wound up eating out so I will end up at about 1984 today which will help my total and tomorrow we are celebrating my birthday. I told myself I could splurge and have whatever I wanted but what I want is banana cream pie and beef tamales. Even planning out my day it looks like it will be about 1738 cals(a high fat day for sure though) so even if I add that on 8792 +1738 = 10530 div. by 7 = 1504 average for the week Okay so this is my question, is a 1500 average daily for the week a bad thing? Do I really need to eat more? EVen with me telling myself I could eat more tomorrwo I know I will not want to! Like I said I could probably be fine every day on about 1200-1300 excepot maybe one day a week. I also seen some of the longer members here at 3fc saying sometimes people are still consuming way too many cals etc. So this is what I am saying, in regards to cal counting, please be honest with me. Is 1500-1550 a week fine? Is 1200-1300 a week fine for me? My major concern here is obviously being healthy, secondary is losing but I do not want to lose 3 a week at the rsik of pleateauing at 180 or something. But if it is doable I would actually really LOVE to only eat that 1200-1300 a day most days cause I feel happy, my tummy doesn't feel stuffed and I just feel great about myself. I would really love to here from you other ladies, and for those of you that have lost and gotten down to or near goal weights that were cal counting would be great to. Thanx in advance! |
What if you just inched your cals down by a few and added some intensity to your exercise? Add a few minutes of jog-ish type steps a couple of times during your walk.
Do you use a calorie counter that estimates your nutrients too? If you drop lower, you may need a mulitivit. |
Zig zagging or calorie cycling is a good way to to keep the metabolism up.
Research shows that while on a strict diet the metabolism can slow down by up to 20%. Not that this would be a good thing-but that's it. There is no scenario you can create for yourself that will make you never be able to lose weight again. Everyone plateaus at some point, and even the people who plan it out the way you are describing. We all have to just keep it up, push through it, and wait for our bodies to catch up. I actually had a doctor tell me once to eat the amount of calories a day to maintain the weight I WANTED to be at. The standard diet my most recent doctor gave me was a printout of a 1200 calorie a day diet-the same one he gives to all his patients with weight concerns. If it were permanently damaging, why would physicians be okay with that? If you are genuinely not hungry-I say listen to your body. On the days that you are more hungry, eat more. Not very many of us got to be fat chicks by eating when we were truly physically hungry. Unless there is a medical problem involved, we make ourselves overweight by not stopping when we were satiated, or running to the fridge or the drive thru when we were bored, anxious, depressed, etc. I think the point of all of this is to get healthy and to eat healthy for a lifetime. That, to me, by definition means not only making better food choices, but also re-learning how to listen to that internal system that tells me when I actually need to eat. No matter what the calorie calculators say we should have. Not to discredit researching, planning, accountability, etc. But in the end, I don't want to have to bust out a pen, paper, and a calculator at every meal for the rest of my life anyway, ya know? |
If you are losing weight, then I don't think you are consuming too many calories. And I think having a few low days and a few high days so that everything balances out to an average you are comfortable with is fine. It isn't the method I used, but that doesn't mean it won't work for you. Based on the anecdotal evidence I see here in this forum, it seems like there are lots of people that use this method of calorie counting and lose weight successfully. Given the rate at which you are losing weight and the fact that you aren't hungry, it sounds like you are averaging about the right number of calories. You don't want your average to go below 1200 calories per day, but beyond that it's just a matter of finding the right number of calories that will let you lose weight at a reasonable pace without being hungry all the time. It sounds like you've found that number.
|
The fiber is what's making you feel full. I stick to a 1200 to 1300 calorie day and some days I'm just fine at 800. Those just happen to be my brown rice and beans days. Go figure.
:-) |
I am a real fan of cycling or zigzagging my calories. It keeps me from getting bored, I have seen the best results and it lets me practice my math skills :) The only downside I see to not eating if you're not hungry is that you MAY be sabatoging yourself by slowing down your metabolism...or for me, that fuels my longlost eating disordered behavior ("Hmmmm....if I lost 1 lb eating 800 calories a day, how much can I lose at 500 a day...") but again, that's me and my screwed-up psyche :)
|
SusanB:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
rebeleagle1965: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have to run and eat dinner with the family but will be back to respond to everyone else afterwards! |
BlueToBlue:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Next week, hmmm...I think what I should try and do is having more healthy cals by adding a tbs of extra virgin olive oild to a salad. That would probably make alot of sense. ANother thing I love is nuts. I do half cashews and half walnuts. Yummy delicious cals that can add up quickly. AnAbsoluteDiva: Quote:
OnePerDecade: Quote:
Quote:
Does anyone have the 411 on protein consumption? Then that takes me back to thinking less is probably better. If I do a 1200 cal day I will not get alot of protein anyways. Like for instance, my 1634 cal day thursday was 30% fat/ 49% carbs/ 21% protein(now sometimes lately I have been having 30% protein days and 40% carb days so I switch sometimes) but even at a 1634 call day and only 20% protein that is still 80 grams of protein! And allegedly that is too much. You take a day like tuesday, 1177 cals, it was 44% fat/36%carbs/20% protein, the grams were 55 which is closer to what they say s a good thing but I barely hit under the 1200 mark to do so. My carbs were also lower which I like, 118. It just seems like the only way not to have too many carbs or proteins is to have a lower calorie day. Yeah the fat grams are a little bit higher but I am watching those too. A 1200 cal day believe me you are not going to be overdoing too much of anything. :lol: Quote:
Well I just wanted to thank all of you ladies for your time and advice. Anyone else want to chime in feel free too! I actually can't wait to get back to normal tomorrow. |
A couple of things here (in no particular order)...
No, I won't bust out a calculator for every meal for the rest of my life, but I will continue to track calories at least in my head every day. I think most of us have to. Not doing that is what made us overweight in the first place, and stopping it is likely grounds for re-gaining. So many maintainers/re-gainers noted that not keeping track after they reached their goal was a mistake. This is a lifelong process; without keeping an eye on things, portion sizes may gradually grow larger (and clothing sizes may gradually grow tighter ;) ). Most doctors are NOT very educated about weight loss. I had a girl tell me today that her doctor put her on an 800 calorie a day diet. WHAT?! How insane. You can't expect someone to eat like that for the rest of their lives, and you can't expect someone to get the proper amount of nutrients out of that little food. I try to eat at least 100g of protein a day. Protein helps to sustain and build muscle. I don't keep track of my carbs or anything, but I definitely try to get a lot of protein. Without enough protein, you're likely to lose even more muscle as you lose weight than you would with plenty of protein. I still eat plenty of carbs, don't get me wrong--my Fitday for today has me at 126g protein and 198g carbs. I do eat when I'm hungry (but only if I'm still hungry after a big glass of water, as sometimes we mistake thirst for hunger). However, I also eat when I'm not hungry. By having eaten the way I have my whole life, I've undoubtedly messed up my natural hunger cues, so they are no longer reliable. If I only ate when I was actually hungry, I would probably only eat twice a day. Instead, I eat small amounts of food 6+ times a day (approximately every 2-3 hours to keep the metabolism going since protein lasts longest in the blood stream, and that's only about 3 hours). As for number of calories, that's a very highly individual thing. However, the idea of eating the maintenance calories for the weight you want to be is likely not a good idea because people who've been overweight no longer burn calories as efficiently as those who have never been overweight. Example: 2 identical twin women (I like to make them twins so we know their genetics, height, and build are the same ;) ) both weigh 150 pounds. If one has never weighed more than 150 and one had become obese and then lost a bunch of weight to get back down to 150, the one who had never been obese will burn more calories each day than the one who had to lose weight. Also for this reason, I eat as many calories as I can to still lose weight because I don't want to HAVE to stay at 1000-1200 calories for the rest of my life just to maintain, ya know? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.