Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2009, 12:25 AM   #1  
The name is Maria :)
Thread Starter
 
mariamherrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,189

S/C/G: 325/291.9/170(for now)

Height: 5'6 1/2

Default any one tried walden farms 0 calorie items?

Has any one ever tried walden farms 0 calorie condiments? they make every thing from salad dressing to jelly to chocolate syrup and marshmallow fluff... supposedly it's all 0 cals 0 carbs! if this true and if so does it taste any good?
mariamherrera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:17 AM   #2  
FB
01.01.08
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,516

Default

They're okay. The texture is somewhat... slimier and sometimes grittier than their full calorie counterparts and the flavor somewhat weaker. I'd recommend them if they were on sale and your hopes aren't terribly high!
FB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:53 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
babes315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 142

S/C/G: 186/ticker/145

Height: 5'6"

Default

I tried one of the salad dressings and one of the ice cream toppings, and one taste is all it took...I didn't have either of them again. Very artificial tasting and weird texture. I know some people rave about them, but I am really picky about food and have to give them the thumbs down.
babes315 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 02:34 AM   #4  
=D
 
mazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 2,071

Default

That can't be right...

are they packed with junk ingredients and chemicals?
mazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:43 PM   #5  
Member
 
Phoenixflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 33

Default

Ugh. I had a taste of a dressing once.

Zero calories. Woohoo... But I don't just take calories into consideration, I take nutrition. Walden Farms stuff is a big heap of chemical goo. If I want a really low-calorie fruit topping, I'll heat up a bit of frozen fruit. I don't need a chemistry set in my belly.
Phoenixflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 12:46 PM   #6  
Strong is the new thin!
 
river's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 585

S/C/G: 178/152/close enough

Height: 5'9 1/2"

Default

I tried the blue cheese dressing a few months ago and wasn't impressed. I'll stick to what I like in moderation instead.
river is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:18 PM   #7  
Made of Starstuff
 
Lovely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New England
Posts: 8,731

Default

I've tried one of their dressings once. Wasn't impressed.

It was slimy & overly sweet.

I just use lower calorie/lower fat options.
Lovely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:20 PM   #8  
Senior Member
 
jessisaokay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 121

S/C/G: 275/142/150

Height: 5'11"

Default

I wasn't a fan. I know some people who love them though. Careful, it's zero cals a serving, which means it can actually have up to 4. Thats can all add up.
jessisaokay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:24 PM   #9  
Senior Member
 
JulieJ08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 7,097

S/C/G: 197/135/?

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenixflame View Post
Ugh. I had a taste of a dressing once.

Zero calories. Woohoo... But I don't just take calories into consideration, I take nutrition. Walden Farms stuff is a big heap of chemical goo. If I want a really low-calorie fruit topping, I'll heat up a bit of frozen fruit. I don't need a chemistry set in my belly.
LOL, and they brand themselves as a "farm." Maybe it should be Walden Chemistry Labs.
JulieJ08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 03:20 PM   #10  
~*Lupo di Autunno*~
 
Wolf Goddess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On a Navy base
Posts: 325

S/C/G: 162/115/115

Height: 5'3"

Default

I wouldn't feed them to a condemned lab rat. D:
Wolf Goddess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 04:01 PM   #11  
Member
 
soybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DE
Posts: 59

S/C/G: 165/153/145

Height: 5'9"

Default

I haven't tried, but I do have problems moderating my condiments so I might want to look into these and just pump up the flavor with spices. Usually for salad dressing I use olive oil though. Its got a ton of nutritional benefits and is 120 calories per a hearty serving. Definitely takes the guilt out when I know its good for my body.
soybean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 06:25 PM   #12  
The name is Maria :)
Thread Starter
 
mariamherrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,189

S/C/G: 325/291.9/170(for now)

Height: 5'6 1/2

Default

ok glad to hear the feed back- I heard some good some bad at other sites but the out come seems pretty synonymous here that they taste pretty nasty! I'll just keep doing what I'm doing portion controlling low calories lower fat dressings. I've heard some people say they take the real version and mix half with the Walden farms so they are cutting the calories in half and it still tastes more like the real version-

by the way I found a light house seaseme ginger dressing that's 35 cals for 2 tablspoons- it reminds me of teriyaki sauce yummy! and also the salsa ranch by lighthouse is only 50 cals! that's my husbands fav!
mariamherrera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 08:53 AM   #13  
MBN
Senior Member
 
MBN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 843

S/C/G: 150/G:finding the happy me

Height: 5'2"

Default

I buy them. I use the salad dressings, the barbeque sauce, and the chocolate syrup. It's true that they don't taste like the "real thing", but for me, it's an acceptable substitute, and a change of pace from other very low cal options like basalmic vinegar. I don't assume they are "zero" cal, though, I assume they have 3-4 calories per serving and count them. But still, I can pour a whole lot on my salad or tofu sherataki noodles for <20 calories, so it's worth it to me. I've read a lot of reviews from people who absolutely hate the taste, so you'd just have to try it and see.
MBN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 12:22 PM   #14  
Not Yet Vintage
 
Vintage Glamour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 38

S/C/G: 203.8/185/135

Height: 5'6

Default

They are GROSS! Stay far far away!
Vintage Glamour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 12:24 PM   #15  
Senior Member
 
Thighs Be Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,629

S/C/G: HW/232 SW 215/ CW 133/GW 120's

Height: 5.7 and 1/2

Default

Yes, agreed. Run, far and fast. Everything I have purchased from them has gone in the trash...a complete and total waste of money.
Thighs Be Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.