Exercise! Love it or hate it, let's motivate each other to just DO IT!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2006, 03:46 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sheila53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,735

S/C/G: 261/158/below 160

Height: 5'8" (Dang, I shrank an inch!)

Default Cardio machine calories burned vs. Fitday calories burned

I'm just curious as to which is closer to the actual number of calories burned. On the treadmill this morning, I entered my weight and age, and according to the readout, I burned 520 calories during my hour of walking/jogging. When I entered the activity in my Fitday log, I had burned only half that number of calories. Even adding the 35 min. of weight training and 20 min. of stretching/abs, I didn't come up to 500 calories burned on the Fitday calculator.

I really have no reason to care about how many calories I burn, but it's just a curiousity thing. Any ideas which one is closer?
Sheila53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 04:35 PM   #2  
it's always something
 
Suzanne 3FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 11,615

Default

I've heard that many of the machines are inaccurate. I used to have a treadmill that told me I burned 900 calories an hour. My new one says it's just a fraction of that. The amount of calories you burn will be based on your weight, age, gender, and the exercise. We don't know if the treadmill manufacturer programmed it for a 170lb 26 yr old man or a 250lb 40 yr old woman. The difference could be huge. I'd suggest sticking with the FitDay info, since it's based on your own stats.

I do have to admit, though, that when I used my old treadmill, the high number of calories it said I burned motivated me to walk a lot longer. It was exciting watching the total grow.

We have a few calulators here that might come in handy.
Suzanne 3FC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 07:33 PM   #3  
repeat offender
 
Miaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 395

S/C/G: 178/167/105

Height: 5' 3"

Talking

I have participated in a study in college where they measured my calorie burned with state of art equipment. The Treadmill or elliptical machine tends to overestimate your actual calorie burned. Not to say that Fitday is accurate, because it is definitely not.

I found that on average, I actually burn about 3/4 of what the treadmill indicates.
Miaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 08:12 PM   #4  
Owned by Dixie
 
L144S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston-North Shore
Posts: 2,464

Height: 5'4"

Default

You should believe fitday the counter on the machines are meant to make you "feel good" and I'll bet it worked
L144S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 09:18 PM   #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sheila53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,735

S/C/G: 261/158/below 160

Height: 5'8" (Dang, I shrank an inch!)

Default

Suzanne, I used the one that you had a link to, and it was equal to the treadmill calories burned. Like the calculator you linked to, the treadmill I use lets me put in my weight (and age--don't know if that makes any difference, but it asks so I answer ) so I'm assuming it's calculating based on that.

Although it really doesn't matter in the scheme of things, it's kind of fun to see if I can burn off my breakfast.
Sheila53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 12:24 PM   #6  
Moderating Mama
 
mandalinn82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 11,712

S/C/G: 295/200/175

Height: 5' 8"

Default

I did a metabolic study once in college (you have to love that they give you extra credit in college courses for being a guinea pig...). Anyway, I found that the treadmill numbers (when they take into account your weight) are more accurate than the fitday numbers. But there are so many variables on that, you can't really know for sure. The cardio machines that don't have you put in your weight are WAY off...but fitday has always run low for me in terms of what I actually burn.
mandalinn82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 07:26 PM   #7  
The Supreme Potato
 
spud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25

Default

Cardio machines that have handles that read your heart rate AND have you enter your weight are probably the most accurate. A $130 heart rate monitor watch that you enter your age, height, weight, and sex will give you a good idea of calories burned during any activity.

spud
spud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.