Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2009, 07:03 PM   #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
angee phalangee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: arkansas
Posts: 230

S/C/G: 250/186/149 (mini: 179)

Height: 5'5

Default Calorie counters on workout machines

Do you trust the "calories burned" counter on the treadmill/elliptical/etc.? I always look at it wondering how accurate it is.
angee phalangee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:06 PM   #2  
This is not a test.
 
Iconised Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,409

S/C/G: 187/132/127.8

Height: 5'5''/165cm

Default

Nope But its still useful

Mostly because it can never pick up my heart rate in the first place, so how could it know how hard I'm working. Plus, I'm assuming it uses something like an average metabolic rate, but thats not necessarily what yours is.

So I dont use it to say "i burnt 350 cal on the treadmill so i can eat a burger and be even" or to figure out how much i have lost. But I do use it as a measure of how far ive gone kinda thing. So each time on the treadmill i might focus on "burning more calories" in 45 mins, rather than trying to run a certain distance
Iconised Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:14 PM   #3  
Let's do this!
 
junebug41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 3rd cornfield on the left.
Posts: 3,757

S/C/G: 210/149/140

Height: 5'6.5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconised Ghost View Post
So each time on the treadmill i might focus on "burning more calories" in 45 mins, rather than trying to run a certain distance
I do this as well. Accurate? No. Useful tool in breaking exercise goals? Yes.
junebug41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:17 PM   #4  
Owned by Dixie
 
L144S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston-North Shore
Posts: 2,464

Height: 5'4"

Default

I think the distance is fine but I wear a bodybugg and I can tell you that my BB tells me that I burn about 1/2 what the machine is calculating.
L144S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 06:23 AM   #5  
banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 281

S/C/G: 222/136/?

Height: 5'10

Default

NOt acurate at all unless their is a weight adjustable setting and even then it could still be off +- 15%. There is no way I as a 130lbs 5'10 24 year old male burn 325 calories in 20 minutes. 220 caolires sounds more realistic

Last edited by benchmarkman; 10-19-2009 at 06:25 AM.
benchmarkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 07:54 AM   #6  
Senior Member
 
MindiV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,216

S/C/G: 220 (2007) 159 (now)/159/140

Height: 5 feet, 8.5 inches tall

Default

I don't at ALL, on any machine I've ever used. When I started the elliptical I was using said I burned fewer than 50 calories in 45 minutes. Yeah...not right. The one my husband and I now have at home, even WITH his weight put in (268 pounds), says he burns 150 calories in half an hour, which I KNOW isn't right. I've got a heart rate monitor that I trust way more than anything the machine says...
MindiV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 08:15 AM   #7  
Chrissy
 
ChristineM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 40

S/C/G: 165/153/135

Height: 5"6

Default

I notice alot that the machine seems to take a general count and it's not really accurate. In general if me and my BF do the same workout program on the treadmill it will say we burned the same.. which is not possible. I weigh 156 and he weighs 195... how could we burn the exact same thing? If it helps push you OVER the amount of exercise you wanted to do I would say use it for motivation but never rely on it.

:-)
ChristineM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 09:25 AM   #8  
Senior Member
 
brooksrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 322

S/C/G: 234.3 / 232.6 / 130

Height: 5'3"

Default

Yeah I don't think they're entirely accurate either, but I think they get a little closer to accurate the more info the machine asks of you. For example, at the gym I go to, the treadmill doesn't ask anything about you, just starts spitting numbers out. Riiiight....
But my fav elliptical goes through this whole weight?? age?? thing and calculates based on your strides per minute and the resistance.

I agree with everyone else though. For me it's not about the number of calories burned, but I try to keep it the same rate each day. If I averaged "10 cal/minute" I try to do that or better the next time.

And really, don't worry too much about calories burned during your exercise! The point of exercise is to get your heart rate up and your body moving. That'll kick up your metabolism and burn more calories throughout the day anyway.
brooksrm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 07:50 AM   #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
angee phalangee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: arkansas
Posts: 230

S/C/G: 250/186/149 (mini: 179)

Height: 5'5

Default

That's what I was thinking. From reading those posts, I'm thinking maybe I should get a bodybugg or some kind of heart rate monitor...might be useful?

Thanks everyone for your input!
angee phalangee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 04:57 PM   #10  
Started 9/20/09
 
mara11jade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 78

S/C/G: 180/180/140

Height: 5'7"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angee phalangee View Post
That's what I was thinking. From reading those posts, I'm thinking maybe I should get a bodybugg or some kind of heart rate monitor...might be useful?

Thanks everyone for your input!

Yeah - which one do you think is better?
mara11jade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 09:26 AM   #11  
Junior Member
 
AlexxusMich2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 17

Default

I checked out the body buggs and they cost a grip... abt 150 bux! Im thinkin of just getting a cheap heart rate monitor or just to wait on one period... i have a habit of adding all thedse gadgets to my workout plan and when i leave to go to the gym it looks like im going skiing lol!!!! then when i cant find one of the items... i just cant seem to workoit without it....

See im glad Im noticing these things about myself so I can address and fix em....
AlexxusMich2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:39 AM   #12  
Owned by Dixie
 
L144S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston-North Shore
Posts: 2,464

Height: 5'4"

Default

the difference for me between the 2 is that the BB you put it on and wear it all day and forget about it. the HRM you have to remember to bring it with you, the strap is really annoying for us girls with "girls" and in then end if you don't remember it, wear it, or use it, have you really spent your moey wisely.

I have had my BB for 45 weeks (it tells me) took it off for the summer and have had it back on for about 6 weeks. it is part of getting dresses in the morning so I am down to about 20 cents a day for my BB with membership.
L144S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.