Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-01-2007, 03:50 PM   #1  
Kristen-LAWL
Thread Starter
 
KrispieD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,053

S/C/G: 251/215/155

Height: 5 8 1/2"

Default Why the Scale Lies

One of our members Katie posted this great link to explain the dang fluctuations on the scale when you've been POP or off. I have reread it many times when the numbers have had a mind of their own and this thread may have saved the lives of some counsellors at my COD!

http://www.***************.net/articles/scale_lies.htm

Why The Scale Lies...
We've been told over an over again that daily weighing is unnecessary, yet many of us can't resist peeking at that number every morning. If you just can't bring yourself to toss the scale in the trash, you should definitely familiarize yourself with the

A single teaspoon of salt contains over 2,000 mg of sodium. Generally, we should only eat between 1,000 and 3,000 mg of sodium a day, so it's easy to go overboard. Sodium is a sneaky substance. You would expect it to be most highly concentrated in salty chips, nuts, and crackers. However, a food doesn't have to taste salty to be loaded with sodium. A half cup of instant pudding actually contains nearly four times as much sodium as an ounce of salted nuts, 460 mg in the pudding versus 123 mg in the nuts. The more highly processed a food is, the more likely it is to have a high sodium content.

That's why, when it comes to eating, it's wise to stick mainly to the basics: fruits, vegetables, lean meat, beans, and whole grains. Be sure to read the labels on canned foods, boxed mixes, and frozen dinners. Women may also retain several pounds of water prior to menstruation. This is very common and the weight will likely disappear as quickly as it arrives. Pre-menstrual water-weight gain can be minimized by drinking plenty of water, maintaining an exercise program, and keeping high-sodium processed foods to a minimum.

Another factor that can influence the scale is glycogen. Think of glycogen as a fuel tank full of stored carbohydrate. Some glycogen is stored in the liver and some is stored the muscles themselves. This energy reserve weighs more than a pound and it's packaged with 3-4 pounds of water when it's stored. Your glycogen supply will shrink during the day if you fail to take in enough carbohydrates. As the glycogen supply shrinks you will experience a small imperceptible increase in appetite and your body will restore this fuel reserve along with it's associated water. It's normal to experience glycogen and water weight shifts of up to 2 pounds per day even with no changes in your calorie intake or activity level. These fluctuations have nothing to do with fat loss, although they can make for some unnecessarily dramatic weigh-ins if you're prone to obsessing over the number on the scale.

Otherwise rational people also tend to forget about the actual weight of the food they eat. For this reason, it's wise to weigh yourself first thing in the morning before you've had anything to eat or drink. Swallowing a bunch of food before you step on the scale is no different than putting a bunch of rocks in your pocket. The 5 pounds that you gain right after a huge dinner is not fat. It's the actual weight of everything you've had to eat and drink. The added weight of the meal will be gone several hours later when you've finished digesting it.

Exercise physiologists tell us that in order to store one pound of fat, you need to eat 3,500 calories more than your body is able to burn. In other words, to actually store the above dinner as 5 pounds of fat, it would have to contain a whopping 17,500 calories. This is not likely, in fact it's not humanly possible. So when the scale goes up 3 or 4 pounds overnight, rest easy, it's likely to be water, glycogen, and the weight of your dinner. Keep in mind that the 3,500 calorie rule works in reverse also. In order to lose one pound of fat you need to burn 3,500 calories more than you take in. Generally, it's only possible to lose 1-2 pounds of fat per week. When you follow a very low calorie diet that causes your weight to drop 10 pounds in 7 days, it's physically impossible for all of that to be fat. What you're really losing is water, glycogen, and muscle.

This brings us to the scale's sneakiest attribute. It doesn't just weigh fat. It weighs muscle, bone, water, internal organs and all. When you lose "weight," that doesn't necessarily mean that you've lost fat. In fact, the scale has no way of telling you what you've lost (or gained). Losing muscle is nothing to celebrate. Muscle is a metabolically active tissue. The more muscle you have the more calories your body burns, even when you're just sitting around. That's one reason why a fit, active person is able to eat considerably more food than the dieter who is unwittingly destroying muscle tissue.

Robin Landis, author of "Body Fueling," compares fat and muscles to feathers and gold. One pound of fat is like a big fluffy, lumpy bunch of feathers, and one pound of muscle is small and valuable like a piece of gold. Obviously, you want to lose the dumpy, bulky feathers and keep the sleek beautiful gold. The problem with the scale is that it doesn't differentiate between the two. It can't tell you how much of your total body weight is lean tissue and how much is fat. There are several other measuring techniques that can accomplish this, although they vary in convenience, accuracy, and cost. Skin-fold calipers pinch and measure fat folds at various locations on the body, hydrostatic (or underwater) weighing involves exhaling all of the air from your lungs before being lowered into a tank of water, and bioelectrical impedance measures the degree to which your body fat impedes a mild electrical current. If the thought of being pinched, dunked, or gently zapped just doesn't appeal to you, don't worry. The best measurement tool of all turns out to be your very own eyes. How do you look? How do you feel? How do your clothes fit? Are your rings looser? Do your muscles feel firmer? These are the true measurements of success. If you are exercising and eating right, don't be discouraged by a small gain on the scale. Fluctuations are perfectly normal. Expect them to happen and take them in stride. It's a matter of mind over scale.
KrispieD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 03:53 PM   #2  
It's mine for the taking
 
Angie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,561

S/C/G: 238 / see ticker / 188

Height: 5'6"

Default

I was expecting something like "because you made fun of it in highschool" or something along those lines...this is good info!
Angie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:11 PM   #3  
Megan
 
marzbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island
Posts: 564

S/C/G: size 14/ pudgy size 10/Size 8

Height: 5'5"

Default

My muscle have bookmarked the article

The primary reason I was a WW failure, but have held true to LAWL is the inches. I ended up losing only 15 pounds, not the 30 I wanted. But, I lost 24 inches and 3 sizes. If I saw the scale not budging on a program that soley went by the scale, I would've been gone after a month.

I see a lot more satisfaction in the fact that I have toned abs, strong arms, and the fact that I'm 10 pounds heavier but 2 sizes smaller than the average woman.
marzbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 05:54 PM   #4  
hdsQrl - Megan on LAWL
 
hdsqrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 575

S/C/G: 200.2/172/140

Height: 5'5"

Default

I was browsing the other forums earlier today and ran across a stickied post about the before/after models you see used in marketing tactics. Sometimes, they find fitness models, take the "after" picture first, and then pay the models to gain weight so they can take the "before" picture later. Makes total sense when you see the ones in bikinis when they're fat. Like, who buys a little bathing suit like that, that will fit perfectly when they lose the weight? (yeah, we might do that for inspiration, maybe, but chances are slim that it'll fit the way they show in the pictures.)

I thought that was interesting, and will remember that the next time I look in the mirror and start to feel bad that I don't look like those "after" models. Crazy.
hdsqrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2007, 11:29 PM   #5  
Debbie on LAWL
 
Debbie367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: music city
Posts: 415

S/C/G: 239/223/135

Height: 5'5

Default

I needed that...thanks Kristen

I am sure Dan is beaming! LOL
Debbie367 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 02:30 PM   #6  
WonderWoman
 
JLem311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LaLa LemonsLand.
Posts: 1,764

Height: 5'5 and a half!

Default

thanks for posting this kristen, i really did need this after the week i've been having.
(p.s.--i'm still angry at my scale though. )
JLem311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 09:22 PM   #7  
Joni - Atlanta, GA
 
Joni135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,053

Height: 5'3"

Default

Good article Kristen...but I'm really posting to tell you how great you and the girls look in the latest photo shots.....I LOVE your side profile shot. You have an Audrey Hepburn neck (that IS a compliment). You have every reason to be proud as a peacock!
Joni135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.