Weight Loss Support Give and get support here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-05-2013, 03:40 AM   #1  
I Can Change
Thread Starter
 
tarabella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Rural Oz
Posts: 33

S/C/G: 151/149.9/120

Height: 5'6"

Default Calories per day OR Net calories??

Hi I have a question as I'm new to counting calories. Do you think I should be aiming to eat around 1,500 calories TOTAL OR 1,500 NET calories after exercise? Any opinions??
Thanks!
tarabella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 06:04 AM   #2  
Senior Member
 
freelancemomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,213

S/C/G: 195/145/145

Height: 5'11"

Default

I've always gone for total, because I don't see exercise as separate from the rest of my day. What about walking to the grocery store or taking the garbage out? Should I add that to my calorie intake? We're always using calories, whether we exercise formally or not. Also, when I exercise I tend to need more sleep, so I'm not using as many calories during the extra sleep hours as I would while awake.

Bottom line, I would only "eat my exercise calories" if I were training very long and hard and really needed the extra fuel. That said, as long as you're in an overall calorie deficit you'll lose weight over time.

Freelance
freelancemomma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 06:13 AM   #3  
Senior Member
 
sacha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,640

S/C/G: 163/128/125

Height: 5'5

Default

Total. Most people do not accurately count their exercise. I would say nearly all actually...!
sacha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:30 AM   #4  
Senior Member
 
Palestrina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,607

S/C/G: 215/188/150

Height: 5'4"

Default

This is confusing for me too, because LoseIt automatically adds calories to my day when I exercise. I have an app called iSmoothRun and reviewers claim it to be extremely accurate since it uses GPS to calculate calories burned and it counts all the hills I go through too, which no pedometer has ever done before. It counts a higher calorie burn than any pedometer I've ever had which is frightenening in terms of eating.
Palestrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:37 AM   #5  
dirty labour daughter
 
merilung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 398

S/C/G: 318/301/155

Height: 5'10"

Default

I don't make a point of eating back my exercise calories, but I do see it as extra insurance - I shoot for 1200 calories a day, so I don't sweat hitting 1500 or even 1600 if I've had a few hours of walking/running in there somewhere.
merilung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 09:38 AM   #6  
*Shakes fist at regain*
 
crispin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 375

S/C/G: 150ish/ 114 / 109

Height: 5'

Default

I do net.

When I'm in weight loss mode, I track my calories and, when unsure of them, I overestimate. I also track workout sessions that aren't a regular part of my daily activities (i.e., I don't count most walks unless they're brisk and over 20 minutes; I do count every time I use an exercise dvd even if it's only for 10 minutes). With exercise, I always underestimate my calories burned, sometimes deliberately and substantially.

Then I keep those exercise calories in a bank, sort of like the way I understand WW to use flex points.

I aim to keep to about 1400 calories a day, but there are some days when I'm truly not that hungry, so I eat 100 or so fewer. Those go in the bank. Then there are some days when I'm hungrier or am doing something social that adds in calories. On those days, I use my "banked" calories.

This might sound kinda complicated and accountant-like , but it ends up happening pretty naturally. Using this system, when I look back over my week's calories, they end up being around 1400 net calories. They may be slightly less because of how I underestimate exercise and overestimate food.
crispin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 07:43 PM   #7  
Back with a story
 
Arctic Mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,754

S/C/G: 281 / 254 / 160

Height: 5'3" - I got taller!

Default

When I use Loseit I just don't add my exercise in, so it doesn't monkey with my calories. There is no way, in my weight reduced and metabolically altered (yay nursing! Yay ketosis!) state, that I could get ANY sort of accurate read on calories burned. Maybe not even with things like a Bodybugg, though that might be as close as I could come outside of a lab.

Total calories is the way to go. Just adjust as needed after a few weeks if your losses are generally lower than you want or you're finding yourself overly hungry. But give it plenty of time before adjusting factors, and don't change too many at once
Arctic Mama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:19 PM   #8  
Senior Member
 
kaplods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 13,383

S/C/G: SW:394/310/180

Height: 5'6"

Default

I suppose it doesn't matter so long as you're seeing results you're happy with. It's pretty difficult though to know what you're actually burning, though.

I haven't yet found an online calculator that accurately measured my calorie needs and calorie expenditures. To lose weight, I have to eat less and burn more than the calculators estimate. I could experiment to find out, but it's just a lot easier to pick a calorie range and see what happens, then adjust accordingly.

Severe hunger, fatigue, or weakness with large weight loss might be an indication that raising your calorie range is called for. If you gain or lose little to no weight, you might be overestimating your burned calories or underestimating your intake.
kaplods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:23 PM   #9  
Heading Downtown...
 
TripSwitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 1,394

S/C/G: 225/165/165

Height: 5'8"

Default

I go by total calories... And I use a FitBit and I also sometimes wear a Nike FuelBand both of which estimate calories burned, but I don't pay much attention to those numbers... Although I have to say the FitBit seems to come up with a pretty accurate estimate of how many calories I've burned in total for the day, since I'm able to lose when I stick to the calorie limits it gives me...

But when I train... right now mostly running... I wear a HRM with GPS, so it's basing my calories burned on my actual HR and my age,wt,ht,& sex... So the calories burned from those workouts I consider to be fairly accurate and if I'm really hungry I might eat some of those back... But I do my best to not do that, because in order for me to lose I need all the calorie deficit I can get... Lol...

Last edited by TripSwitch; 06-05-2013 at 08:36 PM.
TripSwitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:36 PM   #10  
Senior Member
 
elvislover324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,689

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sacha View Post
Total. Most people do not accurately count their exercise. I would say nearly all actually...!
I agree with sacha, except to add that people do not accurately count their calories either. From what I have seen, most people undercount their food calories and then give themselves way too much credit for their exercise.
elvislover324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:48 PM   #11  
Nicole
 
Nikel1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: East TN
Posts: 359

S/C/G: 252/ticker/150

Height: 5' 10"

Default

Hmm, I'm not sure which I do. I eat around 1800 calories per day, give or take 100-200, but I also have a bodybugg and aim for at least 2750 burned each day. My BMR is around 1800, and I typically don't have a problem hitting 2750 burned. I only eat extra calories on a higher activity day, like 10+ mile runs.
Nikel1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:54 PM   #12  
Senior Member
 
elvislover324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,689

Default

WOW nikel!! That's a lot of calories burned!! I only burn about 400-500 on a real tough day for me. If I did what you do, I'd be dead.
elvislover324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 08:59 PM   #13  
Nicole
 
Nikel1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: East TN
Posts: 359

S/C/G: 252/ticker/150

Height: 5' 10"

Default

Well that's all calories burned, not just exercise calories. But the day of my first half marathon? It was at Disney. There was 2 miles of walking to the corrals, the 13.65 miles (crowded course, lots of zig zagging), and then walking around Epcot and back to the hotel, and at 2:00 PM, I'd already burned a total of 4300 calories. I didn't put the bodybugg back on after my shower, but we went to the parks that night as well. And I'd already run a 5K the day before and spent 2 days in the parks. I ate off plan that night with zero guilt. That's NOT typical for me though. (Sad confession - I'm already thinking about what I want for my post marathon dinner in December. LOL)
Nikel1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phase 1 Total Carbs per day question Dolemite Ideal Protein Diet 15 08-19-2017 04:10 AM
Net calories vs actual calories ??? s rosa Calorie Counters 11 02-19-2010 12:08 AM
1000 net calories a day & a plateau joyra Weight Loss Support 19 02-01-2009 01:58 PM


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.