Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2003, 12:29 PM   #1  
Jo
Catatonic
Thread Starter
 
Jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 199

Default Interesting talk with RD (or why the BMI lies)

I went to see my dietician yesterday, and I was saying how my weight loss seems to be slowing down and that is discouraging to me because of how much weight I have left to lose. So she was asking me what weight I was using as my goal . . . I said 135 (I'm only 5' 4"). She looked at me and said, "that seems a little low. Let's see what I have as your goal." I'm thinking, what?! 135 low for someone who's 5'4"? She said that her goal for me is 175.

She then went on to explain that when someone is overweight, 25% of the extra weight is muscle (allowing the person to move about, even with the extra fat). So using 120 as the "ideal" weight for someone my height, she added 25% of the excess weight I had when I started ((starting weight - ideal weight) * 25%) and calculated my "revised ideal" weight at 175.

If I weigh 175, my BMI will still put me in the "obese" class. But I'll be in good company . . . Arnold Schwarzenegger's BMI is 33 (obese).

I don't know, it makes sense, but I still would like to be a "normal" weight (for once in my life). So I'm thinking I'll try for 145, which would be the highest I could go and still fall into the BMI normal range. But then again, maybe I'll be happy at 175. I guess I'll wait and see.
Jo is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 01:10 PM   #2  
Senior Member
 
gonzostar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,087

S/C/G: 302/179/170

Height: 5'6"

Default

yeah, righ tnow my goal is so far away that i really have no idea whether i'll be satisfied with it, you know? so it's at 160, which is in the healthy weight range for being 5'7", but when i get there, i'l have to re-evaluate. i think that's what a lot of us will have to do.
gonzostar is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 01:36 PM   #3  
Senior Member
 
AngiKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 587

Default

I'm very confused by BMI charts and comparing weight with other people in general.

Over the holidays, when my in-laws were here, my mother-in-law asked to borrow the scales. She is pretty young (49 - my DH is nine years younger than I!) and has lupus. She had lost a lot of weight and everyone was really worried. So, she thinks she's gained it back but wanted to know for sure. So, here this tiny little woman - who is wearing the Size Small sweater I bought her for Christmas - standing on the scales and they say "129." She's 5'5'' - the same height as me. I was shocked. How does this tiny person weigh that much?

She's a size 6.

When I weighed my lowest adult weight - 133 - I was a size 10 - and a Medium.

Crazy.

I was encouraged though. I've sort of thought my goal of 150 was a little high. But now I think it's fine. Everybody's different.

Angi
AngiKL is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 01:52 PM   #4  
Losin It For GOOD!
 
BA99TJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,131

Default

whoa. This puts my ideal weight at 187 lbs. Wow.
BA99TJ is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:18 PM   #5  
Future marathon runner
 
Raelynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 817

S/C/G: 310/185/Where my body takes me

Height: 5'8"

Default

That puts my ideal weight around 185 too. I can't hardly remember what it was like being 185lbs, let alone 165. If I feel good at 175 or so, I'll stay there. I'm 5'9" and back when I did weigh 190 (way back when lol), I was only 5'6", so I have nothing to compare it to. My BMI was 39 when I started my weight loss, and now it is 30.
Raelynn is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:26 PM   #6  
if only she'd lose weight
 
SuchAPrettyFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 3,249

S/C/G: 360/see ticker/180

Height: 5'7

Default

That is too much math for me. But I think the BMI is more & more like the old height & weight tables--a standard that might not work for everyone.

I will try the math later when I have more time. (Lunch is loooong over)
SuchAPrettyFace is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 09:10 PM   #7  
Old Cackler
 
jiffypop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 7,525

Default

wow!!!!! i had no idea!!!! is this why the docs are telling me not to lose too much weight when i tell them i want to get down to between 170 and 180??? do they actually KNOW something useful???!!!!!

if this is right - and THAT's a real cheery thought - i have less than 50 pounds to go!!!!!!
jiffypop is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 09:40 PM   #8  
Searching
 
rochemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sometimes left and sometimes right
Posts: 2,488

Default

Okay maybe I am doing something wrong.

((Start weight - ideal weight) * 25%) doesnt seem correct cause
((231-122)*0.25)= 27.25

Now I can derive two formulas from what you said
1. I am given a 25% muscle mass just for being fat(?-I question this a little bit because though I understand the nutriotnist point that when you are overweight sometimes moving your body is a weight lifting excersise, overall % body fat/muscle varies) 231(start weight*0.25(% muscle) = 57.75 lbs. of muscle + ideal weight = 179.75

or
2. ((231(sw)-122(iw)+((231(sw)-122(iw))* 0.25))=136.25

Either way BMI doesn't work for people with muscle (ie. the Arnold S. example), large bone structures, small bone structures, women who pregnant, nursing, people who have metal plates in their skull ;-) and the list goes on.

I think that setting the mini-goals and re-evaluating for general health is the most useful along the way. I have set a goal off 122 lbs. for myself. But I also know I am pretty strong and I continue to work to build muscle, so the first time I can find an impedence weight I will probably adjust that goal to reflect actual body fat.

Sorry to be so analytical, I guess that is just the chemist in me coming out!

Miss Chris
rochemist is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 11:14 PM   #9  
if only she'd lose weight
 
SuchAPrettyFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 3,249

S/C/G: 360/see ticker/180

Height: 5'7

Default

Holy carp! I think I want Miss Chris to do my math. I couldn't figure out the formula until her post. So, thank you, dolly!

According to that, my ideal weight is 207. That's a more attainable goal than 150, but as I lose the weight, I have a feeling that it won't be about numbers on a scale or a BMI number or anything else. It'll be more about the way I feel, how my clothes fit on me, how active I am, etc.

Thank you for posting this, Jo. It made me think.
SuchAPrettyFace is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 04:25 AM   #10  
Slowly going crazy!
 
csbutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 140

Default

Here's how I did the math
Starting Weight...........................262
Ideal Weight...............................120
subtract that..............................._________
Excess weight of ........................142
Times by.......................................x25%
Equals.........................................___ _________
.................................................. ...35.5
Add to Ideal W. ...........................120
Equals a new Ideal weight of:
.................................................. ..155.5 lbs...

Last edited by csbutton; 01-18-2003 at 04:28 AM.
csbutton is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 08:27 AM   #11  
Old Cackler
 
jiffypop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 7,525

Default

i like amy's math, which matches ro's formula 2 ... but i started out at 500 pounds. and my ideal weight is 150, a difference of 350 pounds. 25% of that is 84 pounds, and there's just no way my revised ideal weight could possibly be 235!!! that's just 10 pounds away right now. and i'm about a size 18/20 [maybe a little smaller, but not much]

but at least this shows that my ideal weight could be a bit higher than the 150, a weight at which i feel exhausted, sluggish, feeble.

the adventure continues!!!!
jiffypop is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 11:48 AM   #12  
WW on-line since 1/1/2009
 
Jennelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi, USA
Posts: 2,332

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5'5"

Default

Using the formula, my ideal weight is 133.75. My goal is 135, so I guess I'm one of the few for whom the formula works.
Jennelle is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 01:08 PM   #13  
Just Me
 
nelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,707

S/C/G: 364/--/182

Height: 5'6"

Default

About a year or so ago, I had my body fat tested is a pretty reliable manner. My lean body mass was 170 lbs, which is 20 lbs or so more than the high end of the "normal" BMI.

So my goal weight is 200 right now.
nelie is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 03:39 PM   #14  
Senior Member
 
Nic251's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 126

Default

Hey Jenelle,
How are you doing your math? When I figured it out using 238 as a starting weight, with an ideal weight as 135, I came up with 160.75.

238-135=103
103X.25=25.75
135+25.75=160.75

I don't know what your start weight was, or what the ideal weight for your height is, but maybe you should try again?

HTH
Nicole
Nic251 is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 04:03 PM   #15  
WW on-line since 1/1/2009
 
Jennelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi, USA
Posts: 2,332

S/C/G: see ticker

Height: 5'5"

Default

Nicole -

I actually used my all-time high weight of 242.5, which I rounded up to 243.

243-135 = 108
108 x .25 = 27
108 + 27 = 135

The formula is (starting weight - ideal weight) X 25%. Your math mistake was adding the 25% to the ideal weight, rather than to the difference between starting weight and ideal weight.
Jennelle is offline  
Closed Thread

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
some more interesting reading... suzie76 100 lb. Club 0 09-06-2003 08:13 PM
interesting show on discovery that i watched... lizziness Alternachicks 3 08-07-2003 12:39 PM
Very interesting scientific american article and an invitation diamondgeog General Diet Plans and Questions 2 02-10-2003 06:43 PM
Diet Drink Theory-very interesting! RhubarbJelly WW Clubs and Groups 11 10-28-2002 08:09 AM
A couple of interesting short articles from latimes.com diamondgeog General Diet Plans and Questions 1 07-10-2002 10:05 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.