Food Talk And Fabulous Finds Recipes, Healthy Cooking, and General Food Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-09-2008, 09:14 AM   #1  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default Chocolate Mousse Cake

I had this on the cruise I took this past weekend. It's to die for!

http://find.myrecipes.com/recipes/re...cipe_id=226792
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 12:41 PM   #2  
Senior Member
 
peachcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silverton, OR
Posts: 561

S/C/G: 217/tick/160

Height: 5'5

Default

When I clicked the link it said "page not found"
peachcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 01:13 PM   #3  
to better health
 
Marlene On A Mission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 18

Default

I got the link with no problem.....

The cake sounds delicious, and is low calorie, too.

Last edited by Marlene On A Mission; 10-09-2008 at 05:50 PM.
Marlene On A Mission is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 01:40 PM   #4  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

Right! Okay, here's the recipe:

Chocolate Mousse Cake

Yield
10 servings

Ingredients
1 1/4 cups sugar, divided
1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa
2 tablespoons all-purpose flour
1/8 teaspoon salt
3/4 cup water
5 ounces bittersweet chocolate, finely chopped
1 tablespoon dark rum
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
2 large eggs
1 large egg white
Cooking spray
Preparation

Preheat oven to 350°.

Combine 3/4 cup sugar, cocoa, flour, and salt in a small saucepan. Add water; stir well with a whisk. Bring to a simmer over medium heat; cook 2 minutes, stirring constantly. Place chopped chocolate in a large bowl. Pour hot cocoa mixture over chocolate; stir until chocolate melts. Stir in the rum and vanilla.

Place 1/2 cup sugar, eggs, and egg white in a bowl; beat with a mixer at high speed for 6 minutes. Gently fold the egg mixture into chocolate mixture.

Divide chocolate mixture evenly among 10 (4-ounce) ramekins coated with cooking spray. Place ramekins in a 13 x 9-inch baking pan; add hot water to pan to a depth of 1 inch. Bake at 350° for 25 minutes or until puffy and set. Serve warm.


Nutritional Information
Calories:213 (27% from fat)
Fat:6.4g (sat 3.6g,mono 1g,poly 0.2g)
Protein:3.6g
Carbohydrate:36.8g
Fiber:2.6g
Cholesterol:43mg
Iron:0.9mg
Sodium:49mg
Calcium:12mg

Cooking Light, JANUARY 2002
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 02:17 PM   #5  
Senior Member
 
peachcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silverton, OR
Posts: 561

S/C/G: 217/tick/160

Height: 5'5

Default

Yum. What are ramekins??
peachcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 02:39 PM   #6  
Senior Member
 
paniania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 145

S/C/G: 150/147/120

Height: 5'5"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peachcake View Post
What are ramekins??
Ramekins are kind of like custard cups, but in my experience custard cups are a bit more tapered. Imagine a baby Pyrex French White casserole dish.

That recipe would be awesome to try out! Individual servings would be right up my alley, that way I couldn't eat the whole cake (well I could , but still this way would be less tempting).
paniania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 03:22 PM   #7  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

It's amazing! I joke around saying I fell in love on the cruise (Love Boat) I recently took and can't stop thinking about my love -- the Chocolate Mousse Cake.
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 05:22 PM   #8  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

A ramekin visual:


Last edited by ToutDeSuite; 10-09-2008 at 05:33 PM.
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 06:30 PM   #9  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

Okay, after doing some more research on the cake I had on the cruise, the description of the recipe by the reviewers (there was no photo) I posted doesn't at all sound like what I had. Me thinks NCL cruise line served us something else and I think it's this (the photo and reviewers' descriptions fit):

Chocolate Decadence

4 servings

Ingredients
Cooking spray
1/2 cup plus 3 tablespoons sugar
1/4 cup 2% reduced-fat milk
2 tablespoons plus 2 teaspoons unsweetened cocoa
1 1/2 tablespoons butter
1/2 ounce unsweetened chocolate, chopped
5 tablespoons all-purpose flour
1/2 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/8 teaspoon salt
1 large egg white
8 teaspoons semisweet chocolate chips
Preparation

Preheat oven to 350°.

Lightly coat 4 (2-ounce) ramekins with cooking spray, and sprinkle 3/4 teaspoon sugar into each of the ramekins, shaking and turning to coat. Set prepared ramekins aside.

Combine 1/2 cup plus 2 tablespoons sugar, milk, and cocoa in a small saucepan, stirring well with a whisk. Bring to a boil over medium heat. Cook 30 seconds or until sugar dissolves, stirring constantly. Remove from heat; add the butter and 1/2 ounce unsweetened chocolate. Stir until the chocolate melts and mixture is smooth. Cool chocolate mixture 10 minutes.

Add flour, vanilla, salt, and egg white to chocolate mixture, stirring with a whisk just until blended. Spoon 2 tablespoons chocolate mixture into each prepared ramekin, and top each with 2 teaspoons chocolate chips. Divide the remaining chocolate mixture evenly among ramekins, spreading to cover the chocolate chips. Bake at 350° for 20 minutes or until barely set. Cool for 10 minutes. Invert onto dessert plates. Serve warm.


Nutritional Information
Calories:315 (31% from fat)
Fat:11g (sat 5.7g,mono 2.8g,poly 0.8g)
Protein:4.1g
Carbohydrate:52.1g
Fiber:1.6g
Cholesterol:13.4mg
Iron:2.2mg
Sodium:140mg
Calcium:27mg
Cooking Light, DECEMBER 2003

One of the reviewers states she used Splenda rather than sugar and it turned out great. And it freezes well. Bon appetit!

Last edited by ToutDeSuite; 10-12-2008 at 08:01 AM.
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 08:33 AM   #10  
Member
 
Mahalia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 97

S/C/G: 183/170/150

Height: 5'8"

Default Chocolate....yum

I'm going to try the cooking light one. I love desserts made in ramekins, because it's great portion control, but you still feel like you had a really glamorous dessert.

Thanks for passing this along!
Mahalia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 06:24 AM   #11  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

They're both from Cooking Light, Mahalia. The menu stated it was the chocolate mousse cake, but after reading the description and reviews, it didn't fit the profile of what I had on the cruise. So back to Cookiing Light's Web site I went and found the chocolate decadence recipe and it looks and sounds like what I had on the ship. I'm going to try it soon -- have to pick up some unsweetened chocolate before I can make it. As for the chocolate decadence, one of the reviewers said she made it with Splenda instead of sugar and it turned out. I'm not that brave, but if anyone here is, please let us know how it turns out.
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:05 PM   #12  
Senior Member
 
peachcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silverton, OR
Posts: 561

S/C/G: 217/tick/160

Height: 5'5

Default

I figured that's what ramekins were, I just wanted to be sure. Maybe I'll try this recipe out this weekend!! Yum.
peachcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:06 PM   #13  
a.k.a. Bikini Bottom
 
SBD Sass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 823

S/C/G: see siggy!

Height: 5'10 - tall girls rule!

Default

I'm glad someone bumped this because my favorite dessert is chocolate mousse cake. I'll try to take a stab at it and make my own at home.
SBD Sass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:08 PM   #14  
Senior Member
 
peachcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silverton, OR
Posts: 561

S/C/G: 217/tick/160

Height: 5'5

Default

So do you think the mousse cake one would feeeze well? 10 servings is a lot considering I live alone.
peachcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 03:37 PM   #15  
99 lbs. Gone!
Thread Starter
 
ToutDeSuite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 255

Default

I don't know, peachcake. When I read the reviews it said it is like a mousse with a cookie crust. Another reviewer said the chocolate decadence is far better. And since the chocolate decadence really is a cake and only makes 4 serviings, I think you'd be safer with freezing that one. If you're worried about the extra calories in the chocolate decadence, maybe you could make it into 6 servings instead, but don't forget to cut the cooking time for the smaller portions.

Last edited by ToutDeSuite; 10-16-2008 at 03:37 PM.
ToutDeSuite is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.